From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41780)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1SgyNb-0003U2-Si
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 09:22:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1SgyNU-0005M1-NM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 09:21:59 -0400
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:55230 helo=mx2.suse.de)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1SgyNU-0005LR-H8
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 09:21:52 -0400
Message-ID: <4FE07CEA.3030606@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 15:21:46 +0200
From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= <afaerber@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20120618074756.GA47810@cs.nctu.edu.tw> <4FDEFC6F.10104@suse.de>
	<20120619090230.GA39361@cs.nctu.edu.tw> <4FE04C66.2070203@suse.de>
	<20120619115403.GA49013@cs.nctu.edu.tw>
	<CAEgOgz5ZUNgM4oVapnspX9N-U9rQZ=LGKKwa_dd-+OMVJma3Ww@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEgOgz5ZUNgM4oVapnspX9N-U9rQZ=LGKKwa_dd-+OMVJma3Ww@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Any better way to access CPUArchState in vl.c?
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@petalogix.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, =?UTF-8?B?IumZs+mfi+S7uyAoV2VpLVJlbiBDaGVuKSI=?= <chenwj@iis.sinica.edu.tw>

Am 19.06.2012 14:09, schrieb Peter Crosthwaite:
> Andreas, will an attribute((destructor)) work ? Cos if it does you can
> put your printf pretty much anwhere rather than vl.c

Yes, it might. main() only seems to call cpus.c:pause_all_vcpus(), so
neither first_cpu nor the CPU(Arch)State would get cleaned up. But then
again all my comments are based on qemu.git master whereas Wei-Ren is
working on 0.14.x IIRC.

Andreas

--=20
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=C3=BC=
rnberg