diff for duplicates of <4FE1BDF3.4080702@shiftmail.org>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index b01684d..fa80ca5 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -110,3 +110,8 @@ check if this is the intended behaviour?
 And still an open question is: why the speed of provisioning new blocks 
 does not increase with increasing chunk size (64K --> 1MB --> 16MB...), 
 not even when skip_block_zeroing has been set and there is no CoW?
+
+_______________________________________________
+xfs mailing list
+xfs@oss.sgi.com
+http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 9faf45f..32cdf07 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -4,10 +4,10 @@
  "Subject\0Re: Ext4 and xfs problems in dm-thin on allocation and discard\0"
  "Date\0Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:11:31 +0200\0"
  "To\0Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>\0"
- "Cc\0Spelic <spelic@shiftmail.org>"
+ "Cc\0linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org"
+  device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
   xfs@oss.sgi.com
-  linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
- " device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>\0"
+ " Spelic <spelic@shiftmail.org>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "Ok guys, I think I found the bug. One or more bugs.\n"
@@ -121,6 +121,11 @@
  "\n"
  "And still an open question is: why the speed of provisioning new blocks \n"
  "does not increase with increasing chunk size (64K --> 1MB --> 16MB...), \n"
- not even when skip_block_zeroing has been set and there is no CoW?
+ "not even when skip_block_zeroing has been set and there is no CoW?\n"
+ "\n"
+ "_______________________________________________\n"
+ "xfs mailing list\n"
+ "xfs@oss.sgi.com\n"
+ http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
 
-e97c6545264427044396714bc716aa87273a2f9ce63fee1d04d872789fd9b362
+cbcce6d74d5ab25b2c1a617a26316454cdd03e45597ec1f6e5f77b6c5c6885c4
