From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ShiO0-0004RA-G9 for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:29:28 +0000 Received: from mail.dit.upm.es ([138.4.2.7]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1ShiNz-0001Ds-1f for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:29:28 +0000 Message-ID: <4FE32FBE.4050201@dit.upm.es> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:29:18 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Fern=E1ndez?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4FE03E76.7090400@dit.upm.es> <62D36CCF-34D9-4CF9-A563-33D1D5896B73@dit.upm.es> <4FE20217.2080101@dit.upm.es> In-Reply-To: List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [uml-devel] ubd option parsing problem when using cow filesystems in kernel 3.4 To: richard -rw- weinberger Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On 20/06/12 19:13, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 7:02 PM, David Fern=E1ndez wro= te: >> Finally I managed to do the git bisect with your indications. The result: >> >> # git bisect bad >> 026cee0086fe1df4cf74691cf273062cc769617d is the first bad commit >> commit 026cee0086fe1df4cf74691cf273062cc769617d >> Author: Pawel Moll >> Date: Mon Mar 26 12:50:51 2012 +1030 >> >> params:_initcall-like kernel parameters >> >> This patch adds a set of macros that can be used to declare >> kernel parameters to be parsed _before_ initcalls at a chosen >> level are executed. We rename the now-unused "flags" field of >> struct kernel_param as the level. It's signed, for when we >> use this for early params as well, in future. >> >> Linker macro collating init calls had to be modified in order >> to add additional symbols between levels that are later used >> by the init code to split the calls into blocks. >> >> Signed-off-by: Pawel Moll >> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell > Interesting. > Reverting this commit makes the problem go away? What command should I use to revert that specific commit? I'm not an = expert in git, in fact I just learnt what a 'git bisect' is after your = message ...:-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= --- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and = threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions = will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware = threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel