[refpolicy] [PATCH v2 4/5] Grant dracut_manage_tmp_files to domains called by dracut

[dwalsh@redhat.com (Daniel J Walsh)]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 06/24/2012 02:05 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> The dracut application calls, amongst other applications, ldconfig and
> depmod and gets them to write information in a temporary location created
> by dracut. This allows those domains manage access to these locations.
> 
> Write privileges alone were not sufficient as new files were created as
> well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sven Vermeulen <sven.vermeulen@siphos.be> --- 
> policy/modules/system/libraries.te |    4 ++++ 1 files changed, 4
> insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/policy/modules/system/libraries.te
> b/policy/modules/system/libraries.te index 992d105..834b7fe 100644 ---
> a/policy/modules/system/libraries.te +++
> b/policy/modules/system/libraries.te @@ -131,6 +131,10 @@
> optional_policy(` ')
> 
> optional_policy(` +	dracut_manage_tmp_files(ldconfig_t) +') + 
> +optional_policy(` puppet_rw_tmp(ldconfig_t) ')
> 
> 
Don't transition to ldconfig_t, it is a crappy domain with little value.  Just
add the filename trans rules for dacut and then we don't end up with this kind
of nonsence.

I wish ldconfig_t and consoletype_t... and any other domain invented to
maintain labeling would just dissapear, they just generate bug reports without
adding any security.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk/oazgACgkQrlYvE4MpobNPMQCg1OJ8RGrrsYMa9a+w+JTQEmxI
VDEAoNE6D3FgqKlxgLHqRuEPNA0N4wj6
=gp0p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----