From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1SjDwZ-0006i2-Lz for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 14:23:23 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33469) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjDwW-0006ho-H9 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 14:23:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjDwU-0007vJ-P4 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 14:23:20 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:34255) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjDwU-0007v7-Fz for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 14:23:18 -0400 Received: by wgbds1 with SMTP id ds1so2789864wgb.0 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 11:23:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=MWU2cvY31CDvuIhrwIiF2W3f0Egzb4KveFW1emADs4o=; b=DliuLXixVmgVQZwRx7PXk/DUOwh5okQ4QMJJvxD6vZBHUZ46R4MJAPr9jCnGpTeArA EkqicOrNH+ldjGUDQ3nR1Kv4RbdpDQgA+s1MLD6iDUlEIkpJe4WrsQgnSTk0A8PoyzeN n0o4OYMcUxzIuhxLs+TPHWvcrOZnM+foYWyB4ylqg8Fd9KZiivabr/QRqLxMBQ7VnvSK GKJJx7IxuR+vUxqGSNUcQH00pcp8gi8+eFc3ofbEnp93jaExDdd+Vu+IWzMDBAjDQ2S4 6bRvkanEMjF30xgSekzjo4tnmNto6hu7xB7HtzHahSuaMILFo7LSryzjcFl/Wau+bgpo T2sg== Received: by 10.216.145.149 with SMTP id p21mr7182715wej.1.1340648596476; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 11:23:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian.x201.phnet (9-232.197-178.cust.bluewin.ch. [178.197.232.9]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bc2sm36179826wib.0.2012.06.25.11.23.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 25 Jun 2012 11:23:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FE8AC8F.4010806@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:23:11 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?VmxhZGltaXIgJ8+GLWNvZGVyL3BoY29kZXInIFNlcmJpbmVua28=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.5) Gecko/20120624 Icedove/10.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GNU GRUB Subject: Re: Release of 2.00~rc1 References: <4FE62E30.7080608@gmail.com> <4FE6C1DF.9050000@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <4FE6C1DF.9050000@comcast.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig0A26FBFA2891AEAF6E0D1744" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 74.125.82.41 X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:23:22 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0A26FBFA2891AEAF6E0D1744 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 24.06.2012 09:29, Robert Mabee wrote: > On 06/23/2012 04:59 PM, Vladimir '=CF=86-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrot= e: >> Hello, all. I'm proud to introduce 2.00~rc1 to you. >> It's available as >> ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/grub/grub-2.00~rc1.tar.gz >> or >> ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/grub/grub-2.00~rc1.tar.xz >> As far as I'm aware all issues have been either postponed or resolved >> correctly, so I'll release 2.00 on Monday. Give ~rc1 a spin over the >> weekend and report any issues. >> > Missed this one, where the symbol belongs to some other interface, > but has a value close enough to require an insane test (a filename > containing a newline) to get incorrect results: >=20 > =3D=3D=3D modified file 'grub-core/commands/wildcard.c' > --- old/grub-core/commands/wildcard.c 2012-06-08 20:54:21 +0000 > +++ new/grub-core/commands/wildcard.c 2012-06-24 06:55:33 +0000 > @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ > buffer[i] =3D '\0'; > grub_dprintf ("expand", "Regexp is %s\n", buffer); >=20 > - if (regcomp (regexp, buffer, RE_SYNTAX_GNU_AWK)) > + if (regcomp (regexp, buffer, REG_EXTENDED)) > { > grub_free (buffer); > return 1; >=20 REG_EXTENDED isn't even a syntax type but is just refined to 1. Valid syntaxes are: RE_SYNTAX_EMACS RE_SYNTAX_AWK RE_SYNTAX_GNU_AWK RE_SYNTAX_POSIX_AWK RE_SYNTAX_GREP RE_SYNTAX_EGREP RE_SYNTAX_POSIX_EGREP RE_SYNTAX_ED RE_SYNTAX_SED RE_SYNTAX_POSIX_BASIC RE_SYNTAX_POSIX_MINIMAL_BASIC =09 RE_SYNTAX_POSIX_EXTENDED RE_SYNTAX_POSIX_MINIMAL_EXTENDED =09 Additionally no real testcase was ever demonstrated. --=20 Regards Vladimir '=CF=86-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko --------------enig0A26FBFA2891AEAF6E0D1744 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREKAAYFAk/orI8ACgkQNak7dOguQgmNcwEAn6Ir75UmNmFu5EfldChoEumo n4bsC1t6VRvLmDvvTEsA/Ay/VIzazON4/fY22HKLFIr906IjK2vDilXI4jaNHiZt =5azK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0A26FBFA2891AEAF6E0D1744--