From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Priebe Subject: Re: FS / Kernel question choosing the correct kernel version Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:39:14 +0200 Message-ID: <4FE98342.70208@profihost.ag> References: <4FE60A65.2030800@profihost.ag> <20120626081442.GA12789@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.profihost.ag ([85.158.179.208]:52747 "EHLO mail.profihost.ag" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756173Ab2FZJjR (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jun 2012 05:39:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120626081442.GA12789@infradead.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Sage Weil , "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" Am 26.06.2012 10:14, schrieb Christoph Hellwig: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 03:11:17PM -0700, Sage Weil wrote: >> On Sat, 23 Jun 2012, Stefan Priebe wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> i got stuck while selecting the right FS for ceph / RBD. >>> >>> XFS: >>> - deadlock / hung task under 3.0.34 in xfs_ilock / xfs_buf_lock while syncfs >> >> There was an ilock fix that went into 3.4, IIRC. Have you tried vanilla >> 3.4? We are seeing some lockdep noise currently, but no deadlocks yet. > > Stefan, which deadlock is this, did you report it to the XFS list? Yes i did. You are in CC http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-05/msg00307.html Stefan