From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D899E006D9 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 09:24:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q5QGOSim021468 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 26 Jun 2012 09:24:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.146.67] (128.224.146.67) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.255.0; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 09:24:28 -0700 Message-ID: <4FE9E22E.8080305@windriver.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:24:14 -0400 From: Bruce Ashfield User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jfabernathy References: <4FE9CCAD.7080003@gmail.com> <4FE9CD04.60604@windriver.com> <41DEA4B02DBDEF40A0F3B6D0DDB1237946A130B2@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com> <4FE9DC9B.2090104@gmail.com> <4FE9DD7F.2090402@windriver.com> <4FE9DF3B.8010104@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4FE9DF3B.8010104@gmail.com> Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Yocto Development Manual Appendix B question X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:24:31 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12-06-26 12:11 PM, jfabernathy wrote: > On 06/26/2012 12:04 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> On 12-06-26 12:00 PM, jfabernathy wrote: >>> On 06/26/2012 10:56 AM, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote: >>>> Bruce, >>>> >>>> Should the example note this? Would it be best to specifically say to >>>> uncomment that SRC_URI line? >>>> >>>> Scott >>> I think some text needs to be added. I uncommented the SRC_URI line and >>> I still fail building the image. The failure is related to kernel tools: >>> >>> ERROR: kern-tools-native: md5 data is not matching for >>> file://git/tools/kgit;beginline=5;endline=9;md5=e2bf4415f3d843f43d2e22b0d91a6fee >>> >>> >>> ERROR: kern-tools-native: The new md5 checksum is >>> d8d1d729a70cd5f52972f8884b80743d >>> ERROR: kern-tools-native: Check if the license information has >>> changed in >>> ERROR: Licensing Error: LIC_FILES_CHKSUM does not match, please fix >>> ERROR: Function failed: do_qa_configure >> >> This one is actually fixed on master, but poky-extras .. is just that >> 'extra', so this may still be alive in that repo. >> >> This wouldn't need to be documented, since it's a bug/issue, and not >> something that would persist. >> >> What release are you pairing poky extras with ? I can always create a >> branch to make sure they are consistent. >> > > I was using Denzil because the snapshot noted in the example does not > exist. So there is another doc issue. Aha. In this case, we could note that the poky-extras repo branch should match the main repository branch .. and I could ensure that meta-kernel-dev works in that configuration. That's likely the right solution, rather than forcing you to switch to master (unless you want to :) Cheers, Bruce > > I can always test on Master, but the docs need to be update to reflect > something that will work to completion without errors, IMHO. > > Jim A > >> Cheers, >> >> Bruce >> >>> >>> >>> Jim A >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org >>>> [mailto:yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Ashfield >>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 7:54 AM >>>> To: jfabernathy >>>> Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org >>>> Subject: Re: [yocto] Yocto Development Manual Appendix B question >>>> >>>> On 12-06-26 10:52 AM, jfabernathy wrote: >>>>> In the example in The Developement Manual v1.2 in Appendix B Section >>>>> B.1.7, it states that you need to put in the statement: >>>>> >>>>> KSRC_linux_yocto_3_2 ?="/home/scottrif/linux-yocto-3.2.git" >>>>> >>>>> into the appropriate .bbappend file way now in the poky-extra >>>>> directory >>>>> structure. If I look at that file, |linux-yocto_3.2.bbappend| , I >>>>> seen a >>>>> SRC_URI line, immediately after our inserted KSRC statement, that is >>>>> commented out: >>>>> >>>>> # SRC_URI = >>>>> "git://${KSRC_linux_yocto_3_2};protocol=file;nocheckout=1;branch=${KBRANCH},meta;name=machine,meta" >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Should that line be uncommented or is the SRC_URI already defaulted >>>>> somewhere to use the newly defined KSRC_linux_yocto_3_2 variable? >>>> It should be uncommented. I commented them by default, since the extras >>>> repository is a bit of a collection ground. If they are uncommented, >>>> and >>>> combined with the AUTOREV also set in the file, you are forced to fix >>>> all files, versus just the one you want. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Bruce >>>> >>>>> Jim A >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> yocto mailing list >>>>> yocto@yoctoproject.org >>>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> yocto mailing list >>>> yocto@yoctoproject.org >>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto >>> >>> >> > >