From: Tomas Frydrych <tf+lists.yocto@r-finger.com>
To: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: <rant>the current yocto FAQ is pretty much valueless</rant>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 18:18:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FE9EEF6.7050001@r-finger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1206261252060.5948@oneiric>
On 26/06/12 17:53, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> and if you want major industry players to take yocto seriously, the
> last thing you want to do is answer their heartfelt pleas for
> assistance with, "i'm sorry, that's technically not a yocto question,
> you should try another mailing list."
That's never been case on this list as far as I recall, folk here are
pretty responsive to questions being asked.
At the same time, OE/Poky/Yocto is a fairly complex framework and nobody
should expect that the necessary expertize to build a commercial grade
products with it can be acquired by simply reading a FAQ, no matter how
well written, or by just endlessly asking questions on a mailing list.
As a commercial player you are either prepared to make the in house
investment that is necessary to acquire that expertize (reading the
documentation and studying the source code, etc.), or you you can buy
the expertize on commercial basis from someone who has it.
Tomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-26 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-26 9:09 <rant>the current yocto FAQ is pretty much valueless</rant> Robert P. J. Day
2012-06-26 9:35 ` Jack Mitchell
2012-06-26 9:55 ` Tomas Frydrych
2012-06-26 10:09 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-06-26 10:18 ` Robert P. J. Day
2012-06-26 15:46 ` Darren Hart
2012-06-26 16:06 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-06-26 16:38 ` Tomas Frydrych
2012-06-26 16:53 ` Robert P. J. Day
2012-06-26 17:18 ` Tomas Frydrych [this message]
2012-06-26 17:59 ` Brian Duffy
2012-06-27 9:39 ` Tomas Frydrych
2012-06-26 18:52 ` Tim Bird
2012-06-27 9:09 ` Tomas Frydrych
2012-06-27 14:59 ` Koen Kooi
2012-06-27 16:43 ` Chris Hallinan
2012-06-27 17:27 ` Koen Kooi
2012-06-27 20:14 ` Tomas Frydrych
2012-06-27 21:58 ` Koen Kooi
2012-06-28 7:44 ` Tomas Frydrych
2012-07-01 16:23 ` Philip Balister
2012-06-27 21:14 ` Philip Balister
2012-06-27 21:51 ` Philip Balister
2012-06-26 11:29 ` Koen Kooi
2012-06-26 14:40 ` Rifenbark, Scott M
2012-06-26 15:45 ` Robert P. J. Day
2012-06-26 15:50 ` Rifenbark, Scott M
2012-06-26 16:18 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-06-26 16:26 ` Robert P. J. Day
2012-06-26 16:33 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-06-26 16:51 ` Robert P. J. Day
2012-06-26 17:02 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-06-26 17:05 ` Robert P. J. Day
2012-06-26 17:09 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-06-26 17:14 ` Robert P. J. Day
2012-06-26 17:08 ` Rifenbark, Scott M
2012-06-26 17:12 ` Robert P. J. Day
2012-06-27 16:42 ` Jeff Osier-Mixon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FE9EEF6.7050001@r-finger.com \
--to=tf+lists.yocto@r-finger.com \
--cc=yocto@yoctoproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.