From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Zintakis Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 23:56:00 +0000 Subject: [lm-sensors] Fintek f71882fg ACPI conflict Message-Id: <4FEA4C10.2060904@googlemail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org Hello, I hope this is the right place to place my query! I am trying to take control and initialise my fan censors and=20 "sensors-detect" is telling me that the chip on the board is "Fintek=20 f71869a at 0x290, revision 32". However, when I run sensors (the=20 service) this driver is not loaded (I can't see any of the fan sensors=20 either) and dmesg is showing me the following: [ 2312.804747] f71882fg: Found f71869a chip at 0x290, revision 32 [ 2312.804902] ACPI Warning: 0x00000290-0x00000297 SystemIO conflicts=20 with Region \_TZ_.IP__ 1 (20120111/utaddress-251) [ 2312.804919] ACPI Warning: 0x00000290-0x00000297 SystemIO conflicts=20 with Region \_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.SIO1.RNTR 2 (20120111/utaddress-251) [ 2312.804934] ACPI: If an ACPI driver is available for this device, you=20 should use it instead of the native driver Could anybody tell me what the above means please? Is there a conflict=20 between ACPI and the Fintek kernel module sensors (the service) is=20 trying to load? Is there a separate "ACPI driver" I should be using=20 instead? If so, how can I activate it so that I could get to read my fan=20 sensors? When I run "sensors" (the program) I see very limited information, like=20 this: acpitz-virtual-0 Adapter: Virtual device temp1: +48.0=B0C (crit =3D +127.0=B0C) temp2: +26.8=B0C (crit =3D +127.0=B0C) temp3: +26.8=B0C (crit =3D +100.0=B0C) coretemp-isa-0000 Adapter: ISA adapter Core 0: +51.0=B0C (crit =3D +100.0=B0C) Core 1: +51.0=B0C (crit =3D +100.0=B0C) This is not OK because I don't have any RPMs of any of the fans (I have=20 3 fans running) and various voltages I have on this board. I am using=20 Fedora Core 17 with kernel version 3.3.4 with the latest version of=20 lm_sensors (3.3.2, I think). Many thanks! MZ _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors