From: Tetsuyuki Kobayashi <koba@kmckk.co.jp>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH] net: nfs: extend NFS_TIMEOUT
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 13:32:55 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FEA8CF7.8030108@kmckk.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANr=Z=ZujLbbsfSxXLyuXUOQX7x7bTy1z-ApixObf-mQgY46jw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Joe, Thank you for responding.
(2012/06/27 0:30), Joe Hershberger wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:52 AM, Wolfgang Denk<wd@denx.de> wrote:
>> Dear Tetsuyuki Kobayashi,
>>
>> In message<4FE9711A.2090602@kmckk.co.jp> you wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Are you sure the problems are not in the board specific code?
>>>> OK. I will try the same thing on an in-tree board (maybe, panda board) to check if this is board specific or not.
>>>
>>> I did on a panda board. It has the same problem and this patch solves it. So this is not board specific problem. Please consider to change global setting of NFS_TIMEOUT in nfs.c.
>>
>> net/nfs.c is not the right place to make board specific adjustments.
>>
>> I am still not convinced this is an issue with the global code. It
>> could be your NFS server as well.
>
> I'm not convinced either. It clearly depends on the speed of your
> server, the speed of the connection, the size of the file you are
> transferring, etc.
>
Yes, NFS_TIMEOUT should be configurable.
>> If there are really boards which need longer timeouts, these should be
>> set in the board config files.
>
> In fact I would rather the constant were not defined there at all... but it is.
>
> At a minimum it should look like this:
>
>
> #define HASHES_PER_LINE 65 /* Number of "loading" hashes per line */
> #define NFS_RETRY_COUNT 30
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NFS_TIMEOUT
> +#define NFS_TIMEOUT CONFIG_NFS_TIMEOUT
> +#else
> #define NFS_TIMEOUT 2000UL
> +#endif
>
> static int fs_mounted;
> static unsigned long rpc_id;
>
>
> ...with CONFIG_NFS_TIMEOUT defined for your board.
>
Thanks. I agree this change.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-27 4:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-25 12:35 [U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH] net: nfs: extend NFS_TIMEOUT Tetsuyuki Kobayashi
2012-06-25 21:34 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-06-26 0:50 ` Tetsuyuki Kobayashi
2012-06-26 8:21 ` Tetsuyuki Kobayashi
2012-06-26 8:52 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-06-26 15:30 ` Joe Hershberger
2012-06-26 18:34 ` Scott Wood
2012-06-26 18:45 ` Joe Hershberger
2012-06-27 4:32 ` Tetsuyuki Kobayashi [this message]
2012-07-03 11:22 ` [U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH] net: nfs: make NFS_TIMEOUT configurable Tetsuyuki Kobayashi
2012-07-03 13:47 ` Joe Hershberger
2012-07-03 14:13 ` Tetsuyuki Kobayashi
2012-07-04 2:47 ` [U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH v2] " Tetsuyuki Kobayashi
2012-07-04 5:40 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-07-04 8:25 ` [U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH v3] " Tetsuyuki Kobayashi
2012-07-12 7:30 ` Tetsuyuki Kobayashi
2012-07-12 16:16 ` Joe Hershberger
2012-07-12 16:30 ` Tom Rini
2012-07-12 16:40 ` Joe Hershberger
2012-07-12 21:48 ` Tetsuyuki Kobayashi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FEA8CF7.8030108@kmckk.co.jp \
--to=koba@kmckk.co.jp \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.