From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
To: "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: OSD Hardware questions
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 15:04:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FEB04CC.4050008@profihost.ag> (raw)
Hello list,
i'm still thinking about optimal OSD hardware and while reading through
the mailinglist and wiki had some questions.
I want to use SSD so my idea was to use a fast single socket cpu with
8-10 SSD disks per OSD.
I got the following recommandations through the mailinglist:
"Dual socket servers will be overkill given the setup you're describing.
Our WAG rule of thumb is 1GHz of modern CPU per OSD daemon. You might
consider it if you decided you wanted to do an OSD per disk instead
(that's a more common configuration, but it requires more CPU and RAM
per disk and we don't know yet which is the better choice)."
but in my tests i see a CPU usage of 160% + 15% kworker per OSD Daemon
on a 3,6ghz intel xeon CPU. That's far away of 1GHz per OSD. That's
around 6,3Ghz per OSD. Is anything wrong here?
When i want to use 8-10 SSD Disks i need around 20 cores with 3,6Ghz.
But there is no single socket with 20 cores with 3,6Ghz.
Or should i consider using a Raid 5 or 6?
Anything wrong?
Stefan
next reply other threads:[~2012-06-27 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-27 13:04 Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG [this message]
2012-06-27 13:55 ` OSD Hardware questions Mark Nelson
2012-06-27 14:55 ` Jim Schutt
2012-06-27 15:19 ` Stefan Priebe
2012-06-27 17:23 ` Jim Schutt
2012-06-27 17:54 ` Stefan Priebe
2012-06-27 18:38 ` Jim Schutt
2012-06-27 18:48 ` Stefan Priebe
2012-06-27 19:10 ` Jim Schutt
2012-06-27 19:14 ` Jim Schutt
2012-06-27 15:53 ` Mark Nelson
2012-06-27 17:59 ` Jim Schutt
2012-06-27 15:13 ` Stefan Priebe
[not found] ` <CAPYLRzj916kW=KLy3dMTVPJRoNtPMP_Ejz+YAxRUJ5jZc+HeMg@mail.gmail.com>
2012-06-27 15:28 ` Stefan Priebe
2012-06-27 16:00 ` Mark Nelson
2012-06-28 13:21 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2012-06-28 14:38 ` Mark Nelson
2012-06-28 15:18 ` Alexandre DERUMIER
2012-06-28 15:33 ` Sage Weil
2012-06-28 15:45 ` Alexandre DERUMIER
2012-06-28 15:48 ` Jim Schutt
2012-06-28 21:25 ` Stefan Priebe
2012-06-29 11:37 ` Mark Nelson
2012-06-29 12:35 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2012-06-28 16:01 ` Stefan Priebe
2012-06-28 16:00 ` Stefan Priebe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FEB04CC.4050008@profihost.ag \
--to=s.priebe@profihost.ag \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.