From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Priebe Subject: Re: OSD Hardware questions Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 20:48:30 +0200 Message-ID: <4FEB557E.7030903@profihost.ag> References: <4FEB04CC.4050008@profihost.ag> <4FEB10DA.7010206@inktank.com> <4FEB1EF8.4050307@sandia.gov> <4FEB2480.3080404@profihost.ag> <4FEB4179.8050104@sandia.gov> <937453C8-37D5-4708-B81B-CD97B4AF3BF8@profihost.ag> <4FEB533B.9040107@sandia.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.profihost.ag ([85.158.179.208]:42473 "EHLO mail.profihost.ag" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751969Ab2F0Ssd (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jun 2012 14:48:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4FEB533B.9040107@sandia.gov> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Jim Schutt Cc: Mark Nelson , "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" Am 27.06.2012 20:38, schrieb Jim Schutt: > Actually, when my 166-client test is running, > "ps -o pid,nlwp,args -C ceph-osd" > tells me that I typically have ~1200 threads/OSD. huh i see only 124 threads per OSD even with your settings. > Hmmm. The only other obvious difference, based on > what I remember from your other posts, is that you're > testing against RBD, right? I've been testing exclusively > with the Linux kernel client. right and SSD. So it might be some timing issues. Stefan