From: Glauber Costa <glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Cgroups <cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: "Regression" with cd3d09527537
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 03:07:37 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FEB9239.6080408@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120627230823.GU15811-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1476 bytes --]
On 06/28/2012 03:08 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:43:03PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've recently started seeing a lockdep warning at the end of *every*
>> "init 0" issued in my machine. Actually, reboots are fine, and
>> that's probably why I've never seen it earlier. The log is quite
>> extensively, but shows the following dependency chain:
>>
>> [ 83.982111] -> #4 (cpu_hotplug.lock){+.+.+.}:
>> [...]
>> [ 83.982111] -> #3 (jump_label_mutex){+.+...}:
>> [...]
>> [ 83.982111] -> #2 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.+.}:
>> [...]
>> [ 83.982111] -> #1 (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.+.}:
>> [...]
>> [ 83.982111] -> #0 (cgroup_mutex){+.+.+.}:
>>
>> I've recently fixed bugs with the lock ordering imposed by cpusets
>> on cpu_hotplug.lock through jump_label_mutex, and initially thought
>> it to be the same kind of issue. But that was not the case.
>>
>> I've omitted the full backtrace for readability, but I run this with
>> all cgroups disabled but the cpuset, so it can't be sock memcg
>> (after my initial reaction of "oh, fuck, not again"). That
>> jump_label is there for years, and it comes from the code that
>> disables socket timestamps.
>> (net_enable_timestamp)
>
> Yeah, there are multiple really large locks at play here - jump label,
> threadgroup and cgroup_mutex. It isn't pretty. Can you please post
> the full lockdep dump? The above only shows single locking chain.
> I'd like to see the other.
>
> Thanks.
>
[-- Attachment #2: REBOOT-BUG --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 8518 bytes --]
[ 72.027124] ======================================================
[ 72.027617] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[ 72.027617] 3.5.0-rc4+ #145 Not tainted
[ 72.027617] -------------------------------------------------------
[ 72.027617] systemd-shutdow/1 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 72.027617] (cgroup_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff810a3990>] cgroup_lock+0x17/0x19
[ 72.027617]
[ 72.027617] but task is already holding lock:
[ 72.027617] (cpu_hotplug.lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8104ac9b>] cpu_hotplug_begin+0x2c/0x53
[ 72.027617]
[ 72.027617] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 72.027617]
[ 72.027617]
[ 72.027617] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 72.027617]
[ 72.027617] -> #4 (cpu_hotplug.lock){+.+.+.}:
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81094028>] lock_acquire+0x8c/0xfc
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81513a7f>] __mutex_lock_common+0x47/0x344
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81513e4f>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2f/0x36
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8104ad40>] get_online_cpus+0x2e/0x42
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81012662>] arch_jump_label_transform+0x17/0x4d
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810f2c16>] __jump_label_update+0x3a/0x52
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810f2cbd>] jump_label_update+0x8f/0x9b
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810f304e>] static_key_slow_inc+0x49/0x5d
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81b158ef>] activate_jump_labels+0x19/0x35
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81002099>] do_one_initcall+0x7f/0x13a
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81b03d2b>] kernel_init+0x157/0x1db
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8151e3b4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[ 72.027617]
[ 72.027617] -> #3 (jump_label_mutex){+.+...}:
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81094028>] lock_acquire+0x8c/0xfc
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81513a7f>] __mutex_lock_common+0x47/0x344
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81513e4f>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2f/0x36
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810f2d6a>] jump_label_lock+0x17/0x19
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810f3055>] static_key_slow_inc+0x50/0x5d
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81427c40>] net_enable_timestamp+0x5d/0x61
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8141c8dd>] sock_enable_timestamp+0x36/0x3b
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8141cd9d>] sock_setsockopt+0x363/0x57a
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81418d99>] sys_setsockopt+0x6d/0xa6
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8151cf69>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 72.027617]
[ 72.027617] -> #2 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.+.}:
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81094028>] lock_acquire+0x8c/0xfc
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8141b423>] lock_sock_nested+0x70/0x80
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81462ee9>] lock_sock+0xb/0xd
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81466fba>] tcp_close+0x1e/0x303
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff814841ae>] inet_release+0xc2/0xcd
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81417307>] sock_release+0x1f/0x74
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81417383>] sock_close+0x27/0x2b
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81140adb>] fput+0x10b/0x20a
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8113d89c>] filp_close+0x6f/0x7a
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8113ddb3>] sys_close+0xdb/0x11a
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81145c11>] setup_new_exec+0x286/0x2b2
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8118407c>] load_elf_binary+0x343/0x1813
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff811443f2>] search_binary_handler+0xd3/0x2d3
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8114580e>] do_execve_common.isra.31+0x296/0x393
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81145926>] do_execve+0x1b/0x1d
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810169fe>] sys_execve+0x43/0x5a
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8151d42c>] stub_execve+0x6c/0xc0
[ 72.027617]
[ 72.027617] -> #1 (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.+.}:
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81094028>] lock_acquire+0x8c/0xfc
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81513a7f>] __mutex_lock_common+0x47/0x344
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81513e4f>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2f/0x36
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810a8091>] attach_task_by_pid+0x14d/0x4d1
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810a8440>] cgroup_tasks_write+0x13/0x15
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810a7c1c>] cgroup_file_write+0x101/0x25f
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8113f724>] vfs_write+0xa0/0x102
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8113f938>] sys_write+0x43/0x70
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8151cf69>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 72.027617]
[ 72.027617] -> #0 (cgroup_mutex){+.+.+.}:
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810938a8>] __lock_acquire+0x9b0/0xd0c
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81094028>] lock_acquire+0x8c/0xfc
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81513a7f>] __mutex_lock_common+0x47/0x344
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81513e4f>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2f/0x36
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810a3990>] cgroup_lock+0x17/0x19
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810ab456>] cpuset_update_active_cpus+0x13/0x6f
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8106f6c9>] cpuset_cpu_inactive+0x1a/0x23
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff815197ad>] notifier_call_chain+0x6c/0x97
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8106b14a>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0xe/0x10
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8104ac43>] __cpu_notify+0x20/0x37
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff814f2ec1>] _cpu_down+0x7d/0x240
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8104afb1>] disable_nonboot_cpus+0x67/0x11b
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8105bac8>] kernel_power_off+0x48/0x6c
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8105c297>] sys_reboot+0x137/0x1ca
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8151cf69>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 72.027617]
[ 72.027617] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 72.027617]
[ 72.027617] Chain exists of:
[ 72.027617] cgroup_mutex --> jump_label_mutex --> cpu_hotplug.lock
[ 72.027617]
[ 72.027617] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 72.027617]
[ 72.027617] CPU0 CPU1
[ 72.027617] ---- ----
[ 72.027617] lock(cpu_hotplug.lock);
[ 72.027617] lock(jump_label_mutex);
[ 72.027617] lock(cpu_hotplug.lock);
[ 72.027617] lock(cgroup_mutex);
[ 72.027617]
[ 72.027617] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 72.027617]
[ 72.027617] 3 locks held by systemd-shutdow/1:
[ 72.027617] #0: (reboot_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8105c222>] sys_reboot+0xc2/0x1ca
[ 72.027617] #1: (cpu_add_remove_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8104adb9>] cpu_maps_update_begin+0x17/0x19
[ 72.027617] #2: (cpu_hotplug.lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8104ac9b>] cpu_hotplug_begin+0x2c/0x53
[ 72.027617]
[ 72.027617] stack backtrace:
[ 72.027617] Pid: 1, comm: systemd-shutdow Not tainted 3.5.0-rc4+ #145
[ 72.027617] Call Trace:
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8150dc86>] print_circular_bug+0x1f8/0x209
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810938a8>] __lock_acquire+0x9b0/0xd0c
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81515f3a>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2d/0x36
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81094028>] lock_acquire+0x8c/0xfc
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810a3990>] ? cgroup_lock+0x17/0x19
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81513a7f>] __mutex_lock_common+0x47/0x344
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810a3990>] ? cgroup_lock+0x17/0x19
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810a3990>] ? cgroup_lock+0x17/0x19
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81513e4f>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2f/0x36
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8127c37b>] ? __bitmap_weight+0x33/0x7f
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810a3990>] cgroup_lock+0x17/0x19
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810ab456>] cpuset_update_active_cpus+0x13/0x6f
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8106f6c9>] cpuset_cpu_inactive+0x1a/0x23
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff815197ad>] notifier_call_chain+0x6c/0x97
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8106b14a>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0xe/0x10
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8104ac43>] __cpu_notify+0x20/0x37
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff814f2ec1>] _cpu_down+0x7d/0x240
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8150cfe1>] ? printk+0x61/0x63
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8104afb1>] disable_nonboot_cpus+0x67/0x11b
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8105bac8>] kernel_power_off+0x48/0x6c
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8105c297>] sys_reboot+0x137/0x1ca
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81094044>] ? lock_acquire+0xa8/0xfc
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff811420ae>] ? iterate_supers+0x83/0xc4
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81515f09>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_bh+0x31/0x35
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81093f55>] ? lock_release+0x160/0x1a7
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8151cf95>] ? sysret_check+0x22/0x5d
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810944a7>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x117/0x173
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8127ac3e>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8151cf69>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: "Regression" with cd3d09527537
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 03:07:37 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FEB9239.6080408@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120627230823.GU15811@google.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1476 bytes --]
On 06/28/2012 03:08 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:43:03PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've recently started seeing a lockdep warning at the end of *every*
>> "init 0" issued in my machine. Actually, reboots are fine, and
>> that's probably why I've never seen it earlier. The log is quite
>> extensively, but shows the following dependency chain:
>>
>> [ 83.982111] -> #4 (cpu_hotplug.lock){+.+.+.}:
>> [...]
>> [ 83.982111] -> #3 (jump_label_mutex){+.+...}:
>> [...]
>> [ 83.982111] -> #2 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.+.}:
>> [...]
>> [ 83.982111] -> #1 (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.+.}:
>> [...]
>> [ 83.982111] -> #0 (cgroup_mutex){+.+.+.}:
>>
>> I've recently fixed bugs with the lock ordering imposed by cpusets
>> on cpu_hotplug.lock through jump_label_mutex, and initially thought
>> it to be the same kind of issue. But that was not the case.
>>
>> I've omitted the full backtrace for readability, but I run this with
>> all cgroups disabled but the cpuset, so it can't be sock memcg
>> (after my initial reaction of "oh, fuck, not again"). That
>> jump_label is there for years, and it comes from the code that
>> disables socket timestamps.
>> (net_enable_timestamp)
>
> Yeah, there are multiple really large locks at play here - jump label,
> threadgroup and cgroup_mutex. It isn't pretty. Can you please post
> the full lockdep dump? The above only shows single locking chain.
> I'd like to see the other.
>
> Thanks.
>
[-- Attachment #2: REBOOT-BUG --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 8518 bytes --]
[ 72.027124] ======================================================
[ 72.027617] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[ 72.027617] 3.5.0-rc4+ #145 Not tainted
[ 72.027617] -------------------------------------------------------
[ 72.027617] systemd-shutdow/1 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 72.027617] (cgroup_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff810a3990>] cgroup_lock+0x17/0x19
[ 72.027617]
[ 72.027617] but task is already holding lock:
[ 72.027617] (cpu_hotplug.lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8104ac9b>] cpu_hotplug_begin+0x2c/0x53
[ 72.027617]
[ 72.027617] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 72.027617]
[ 72.027617]
[ 72.027617] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 72.027617]
[ 72.027617] -> #4 (cpu_hotplug.lock){+.+.+.}:
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81094028>] lock_acquire+0x8c/0xfc
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81513a7f>] __mutex_lock_common+0x47/0x344
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81513e4f>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2f/0x36
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8104ad40>] get_online_cpus+0x2e/0x42
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81012662>] arch_jump_label_transform+0x17/0x4d
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810f2c16>] __jump_label_update+0x3a/0x52
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810f2cbd>] jump_label_update+0x8f/0x9b
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810f304e>] static_key_slow_inc+0x49/0x5d
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81b158ef>] activate_jump_labels+0x19/0x35
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81002099>] do_one_initcall+0x7f/0x13a
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81b03d2b>] kernel_init+0x157/0x1db
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8151e3b4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[ 72.027617]
[ 72.027617] -> #3 (jump_label_mutex){+.+...}:
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81094028>] lock_acquire+0x8c/0xfc
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81513a7f>] __mutex_lock_common+0x47/0x344
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81513e4f>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2f/0x36
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810f2d6a>] jump_label_lock+0x17/0x19
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810f3055>] static_key_slow_inc+0x50/0x5d
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81427c40>] net_enable_timestamp+0x5d/0x61
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8141c8dd>] sock_enable_timestamp+0x36/0x3b
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8141cd9d>] sock_setsockopt+0x363/0x57a
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81418d99>] sys_setsockopt+0x6d/0xa6
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8151cf69>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 72.027617]
[ 72.027617] -> #2 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.+.}:
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81094028>] lock_acquire+0x8c/0xfc
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8141b423>] lock_sock_nested+0x70/0x80
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81462ee9>] lock_sock+0xb/0xd
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81466fba>] tcp_close+0x1e/0x303
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff814841ae>] inet_release+0xc2/0xcd
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81417307>] sock_release+0x1f/0x74
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81417383>] sock_close+0x27/0x2b
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81140adb>] fput+0x10b/0x20a
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8113d89c>] filp_close+0x6f/0x7a
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8113ddb3>] sys_close+0xdb/0x11a
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81145c11>] setup_new_exec+0x286/0x2b2
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8118407c>] load_elf_binary+0x343/0x1813
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff811443f2>] search_binary_handler+0xd3/0x2d3
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8114580e>] do_execve_common.isra.31+0x296/0x393
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81145926>] do_execve+0x1b/0x1d
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810169fe>] sys_execve+0x43/0x5a
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8151d42c>] stub_execve+0x6c/0xc0
[ 72.027617]
[ 72.027617] -> #1 (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.+.}:
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81094028>] lock_acquire+0x8c/0xfc
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81513a7f>] __mutex_lock_common+0x47/0x344
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81513e4f>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2f/0x36
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810a8091>] attach_task_by_pid+0x14d/0x4d1
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810a8440>] cgroup_tasks_write+0x13/0x15
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810a7c1c>] cgroup_file_write+0x101/0x25f
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8113f724>] vfs_write+0xa0/0x102
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8113f938>] sys_write+0x43/0x70
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8151cf69>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 72.027617]
[ 72.027617] -> #0 (cgroup_mutex){+.+.+.}:
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810938a8>] __lock_acquire+0x9b0/0xd0c
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81094028>] lock_acquire+0x8c/0xfc
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81513a7f>] __mutex_lock_common+0x47/0x344
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81513e4f>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2f/0x36
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810a3990>] cgroup_lock+0x17/0x19
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810ab456>] cpuset_update_active_cpus+0x13/0x6f
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8106f6c9>] cpuset_cpu_inactive+0x1a/0x23
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff815197ad>] notifier_call_chain+0x6c/0x97
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8106b14a>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0xe/0x10
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8104ac43>] __cpu_notify+0x20/0x37
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff814f2ec1>] _cpu_down+0x7d/0x240
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8104afb1>] disable_nonboot_cpus+0x67/0x11b
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8105bac8>] kernel_power_off+0x48/0x6c
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8105c297>] sys_reboot+0x137/0x1ca
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8151cf69>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 72.027617]
[ 72.027617] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 72.027617]
[ 72.027617] Chain exists of:
[ 72.027617] cgroup_mutex --> jump_label_mutex --> cpu_hotplug.lock
[ 72.027617]
[ 72.027617] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 72.027617]
[ 72.027617] CPU0 CPU1
[ 72.027617] ---- ----
[ 72.027617] lock(cpu_hotplug.lock);
[ 72.027617] lock(jump_label_mutex);
[ 72.027617] lock(cpu_hotplug.lock);
[ 72.027617] lock(cgroup_mutex);
[ 72.027617]
[ 72.027617] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 72.027617]
[ 72.027617] 3 locks held by systemd-shutdow/1:
[ 72.027617] #0: (reboot_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8105c222>] sys_reboot+0xc2/0x1ca
[ 72.027617] #1: (cpu_add_remove_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8104adb9>] cpu_maps_update_begin+0x17/0x19
[ 72.027617] #2: (cpu_hotplug.lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8104ac9b>] cpu_hotplug_begin+0x2c/0x53
[ 72.027617]
[ 72.027617] stack backtrace:
[ 72.027617] Pid: 1, comm: systemd-shutdow Not tainted 3.5.0-rc4+ #145
[ 72.027617] Call Trace:
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8150dc86>] print_circular_bug+0x1f8/0x209
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810938a8>] __lock_acquire+0x9b0/0xd0c
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81515f3a>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2d/0x36
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81094028>] lock_acquire+0x8c/0xfc
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810a3990>] ? cgroup_lock+0x17/0x19
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81513a7f>] __mutex_lock_common+0x47/0x344
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810a3990>] ? cgroup_lock+0x17/0x19
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810a3990>] ? cgroup_lock+0x17/0x19
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81513e4f>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2f/0x36
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8127c37b>] ? __bitmap_weight+0x33/0x7f
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810a3990>] cgroup_lock+0x17/0x19
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810ab456>] cpuset_update_active_cpus+0x13/0x6f
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8106f6c9>] cpuset_cpu_inactive+0x1a/0x23
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff815197ad>] notifier_call_chain+0x6c/0x97
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8106b14a>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0xe/0x10
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8104ac43>] __cpu_notify+0x20/0x37
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff814f2ec1>] _cpu_down+0x7d/0x240
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8150cfe1>] ? printk+0x61/0x63
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8104afb1>] disable_nonboot_cpus+0x67/0x11b
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8105bac8>] kernel_power_off+0x48/0x6c
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8105c297>] sys_reboot+0x137/0x1ca
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81094044>] ? lock_acquire+0xa8/0xfc
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff811420ae>] ? iterate_supers+0x83/0xc4
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81515f09>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_bh+0x31/0x35
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff81093f55>] ? lock_release+0x160/0x1a7
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8151cf95>] ? sysret_check+0x22/0x5d
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff810944a7>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x117/0x173
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8127ac3e>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
[ 72.027617] [<ffffffff8151cf69>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-27 23:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-26 12:43 "Regression" with cd3d09527537 Glauber Costa
2012-06-26 12:43 ` Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <4FE9AE57.4090007-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-27 23:08 ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-27 23:08 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20120627230823.GU15811-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-27 23:07 ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2012-06-27 23:07 ` Glauber Costa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FEB9239.6080408@parallels.com \
--to=glommer-bzqdu9zft3wakbo8gow8eq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.