From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rick Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] l2tp: use per-cpu variables for u64_stats updates Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 16:39:09 -0700 Message-ID: <4FEB999D.20309@hp.com> References: <4FEB7BB9.1080905@candelatech.com> <1340832947.26242.169.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <4FEB90C3.9050607@hp.com> <20120627.160922.686783180082355740.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, greearb@candelatech.com, shemminger@vyatta.com, tparkin@katalix.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, David.Laight@ACULAB.COM, jchapman@katalix.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from g4t0017.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.20]:6088 "EHLO g4t0017.houston.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750811Ab2F0XjL (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jun 2012 19:39:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120627.160922.686783180082355740.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/27/2012 04:09 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Rick Jones > Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 16:01:23 -0700 > >> At 100 Gbit/s Ethernet, that is upwards of 147 > > Listing upcoming technologies shows that you miss Eric's point. > > Nobody with a brain is going to drive those kinds of cards on boxes > running 32-bit kernels. Yes, I strayed from the context of 32-bit kernels. I will go run iperf a couple times as penance :) rick