From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laxman Dewangan Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: snd_dmaengine: add common api for pcm_mmap Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:37:27 +0530 Message-ID: <4FEC48FF.9040408@nvidia.com> References: <1340866886-24432-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <20120628105148.GD28922@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4FEC468A.3080607@nvidia.com> <20120628120245.GF28922@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120628120245.GF28922@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: "perex@perex.cz" , "tiwai@suse.de" , "lrg@ti.com" , "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Stephen Warren List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Thursday 28 June 2012 05:32 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > * PGP Signed by an unknown key > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 05:26:58PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > >> Other driver which can use this API are davinci, OMAP, samsung but >> because they are not using the snd_dmaengine_pcm driver's api as of >> now so not be very much useful for them. > There's no reason why we can't factor out more common code - this is > essentially what Lars-Peter was saying. > Ok, then let me start on this. >> Should I send one patch per driver change or squash all 4 file >> changes in one patch? Whatever will be easy or recommended? > It doesn't really matter that much, but please take on board > Lars-Peter's comments. Ok then I will go for one patch per file. I will send the patches in series.