From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4FEC5BD9.4060105@grandegger.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:27:53 +0200 From: Wolfgang Grandegger MIME-Version: 1.0 References: , <4FE60190.5000108@xenomai.org> <4FEC3FF0.1050307@grandegger.com>, <4FEC4245.9090804@grandegger.com> <4FEC46B5.7060700@grandegger.com> <4FEC5381.9040804@epfl.ch> <4FEC570A.8040406@grandegger.com> In-Reply-To: <4FEC570A.8040406@grandegger.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai] Peak PCI CAN card RTCAN problem List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Klas Kronander Cc: "xenomai@xenomai.org" On 06/28/2012 03:07 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > On 06/28/2012 02:52 PM, Klas Kronander wrote: >> Hi, >> >> ok did that. The return value from rt_dev_socket is -14. I could not >> find the definition of EPROTONOSUPPORT anywhere, so I don't know if this >> was the expected value? > > ~$ errno 14 > #define EFAULT 14 /* Bad address */ > > Hm, strange. I have to look that up. To better understand what you are doing... are you using a Xenomai enabled kernel? Does the latency test work? Wolfgang.