From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Yuval Mintz" Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/11] default maximal number of RSS queues in mq drivers Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 07:55:25 +0300 Message-ID: <4FF129BD.8070904@broadcom.com> References: <1341148740-7375-1-git-send-email-yuvalmin@broadcom.com> <4FF0663C.1070306@mellanox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, eilong@broadcom.com, "Divy Le Ray" , "Jon Mason" , "Anirban Chakraborty" , "Jitendra Kalsaria" , "Ron Mercer" , "Jeff Kirsher" , "Jon Mason" , "Andrew Gallatin" , "Sathya Perla" , "Subbu Seetharaman" , "Ajit Khaparde" , "Matt Carlson" , "Michael Chan" , "Eric Dumazet" , "Ben Hutchings" To: "Or Gerlitz" Return-path: Received: from mms3.broadcom.com ([216.31.210.19]:2342 "EHLO mms3.broadcom.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752034Ab2GBE4u (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jul 2012 00:56:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4FF0663C.1070306@mellanox.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > I assume this posting is actually v3 of "[RFC net-next (v2) 00/14] default maximal number of RSS queues in mq drivers" see http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=134062509310404&w=2? > Of course you are correct - the fact that it's based on that RFC is stated explicitly in PATCH 0 of this series. > correct? so what has been changed along v0/v1/v2 --> v3? It would be very helpful to follow > if you make sure to mark the patches that makes Vn with "PATCH net-next Vn" and specify the changes > from Vn-1, Vn-2...V1, V0. Certainly - Changes from RFC v2: - Removed changes for igb, igbxe, and igxbevf drivers. Changes from RFC v1: - Use 'netif_get_num_default_rss_queues()' wrapper function instead of using a hard-coded define value directly. - Corrected be2net implementation of this fix. Cheers, Yuval