From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: "Igor Mitsyanko" <i.mitsyanko@samsung.com>,
"Evgeny Voevodin" <e.voevodin@samsung.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kyungmin.park@samsung.com,
d.solodkiy@samsung.com, "Oleg Ogurtsov" <o.ogurtsov@samsung.com>,
"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Exynos4: added RTC device
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 11:46:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FF16DFC.2090700@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA9wYbLsa8SPehVJ-3YL8FPRW6BWgH55SPVNJWCGap7UAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Il 02/07/2012 11:44, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
> On 2 July 2012 10:42, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>> > Personally, I believe it'd be best if board descriptions were moved to
>> > hw/ARCH, even if all the required hardware is in hw/ and even if the
>> > file can be moved from obj-y to hw-obj-y. However, this can be left
>> > open to later discussion, and is complicated by the fact that some
>> > boards (e.g. musicpal) include devices and machine models in the same file.
> I don't personally see the distinction between "device model" and
> "machine model" as particularly interesting, and I hope/think that
> with increased QOMification the implementation differences beween
> the two will tend go away.
I agree. The distinction is just that machine models often have a
dependency on target-ARCH/ files, and that would be (for me) the line
between hw/ and hw/ARCH.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-02 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1340610940-923-1-git-send-email-o.ogurtsov@samsung.com>
[not found] ` <1340610940-923-2-git-send-email-o.ogurtsov@samsung.com>
[not found] ` <4FE82E60.5050007@suse.de>
[not found] ` <4FE84FAE.1050709@samsung.com>
[not found] ` <4FE852F7.9060405@suse.de>
[not found] ` <4FE92A16.5060705@samsung.com>
[not found] ` <4FED9EFA.8040402@suse.de>
2012-07-01 15:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Exynos4: added RTC device Paolo Bonzini
2012-07-02 9:08 ` Igor Mitsyanko
2012-07-02 9:31 ` Peter Maydell
2012-07-02 9:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-07-02 9:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-07-02 9:44 ` Peter Maydell
2012-07-02 9:46 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2012-07-02 12:27 ` Andreas Färber
2012-07-02 12:04 ` Andreas Färber
2012-07-02 12:19 ` Peter Maydell
2012-07-02 11:44 ` Andreas Färber
2012-07-02 12:18 ` Igor Mitsyanko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FF16DFC.2090700@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=d.solodkiy@samsung.com \
--cc=e.voevodin@samsung.com \
--cc=i.mitsyanko@samsung.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=o.ogurtsov@samsung.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.