From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp06.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.128]:23147 "EHLO smtp.smtpout.orange.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932569Ab2GCTRW (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2012 15:17:22 -0400 Message-ID: <4FF3453F.5090404@petaramesh.org> Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 21:17:19 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sw=E2mi_Petaramesh?= MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hugo Mills , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BTRFS fsck apparent errors References: <4FF30B55.6060205@petaramesh.org> <20120703152208.GA28701@carfax.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20120703152208.GA28701@carfax.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le 03/07/2012 17:22, Hugo Mills a écrit : > What you're seeing is the fact that you've still got the complete ext4 > filesystem and all of its data sitting untouched on the disk as well. > The defrag will have taken a complete new copy of the data but not > removed the ext4 copy. I though about that... However, I had "btrfs su del" the ext2_saved subvolume, so it is expected to have been deleted... If not, how could I possibly delete it, now that I can't see it anymore ? >> It doesn't seem that btrfsck attempts to fix these errors in any >> way... It just displays them. > Correct, by default it just checks the filesystem. Just to be sure: > the filesystems in question weren't mounted, were they? > > No, the filesystems weren't mounted... If by default, btrfsck doesn't fix, how could I ask it to fix ? "man btrfsck" or "btrfsck -h" do not show any option, only a device name... TIA. Kind regards. -- Swâmi Petaramesh http://petaramesh.org PGP 9076E32E