From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-we0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:51680 "EHLO mail-we0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932314Ab2GDAai (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2012 20:30:38 -0400 Received: by werb14 with SMTP id b14so3897377wer.19 for ; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 17:30:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FF38EA9.8000709@gmail.com> (sfid-20120704_023056_270186_C64C0D5A) Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 02:30:33 +0200 From: Xose Vazquez Perez MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" CC: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org, linville@tuxdriver.com Subject: Re: [wireless-regdb] [PATCH] wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for ES (Spain) on 5GHz and 2.4GHz References: <1341350730-11037-1-git-send-email-xose.vazquez@gmail.com> <4FF38492.20003@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/04/2012 01:59 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > Please send a new patch and if you are going to convert something form > dBm to mW then please do that in *one* single patch so that it can > easily be read what changes you are *actually* making. That is one > patch to make a conversion in units that will not make any actual > changes, and then send another patch with all the verbiage you can use > to explain *why* you want the change you are making. You want the > commit log to have enough language so that if I forward the patch to a > regulatory person who has never read a patch they can read it. There was only one patch. The second mail was only a "Signed-off-by:", just in case. > The agreed upon "bar" for quality of regulatory patches was agreed > upon a while ago, for details see: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=128414096127554&w=2 Thank youuuuu http://wireless.kernel.org/en/developers/Regulatory#Mailing_list_for_regulatory_updates :-P > The more information you can provide the better. I believe I sent enough. -thanks- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1SmDUO-0002pC-LC for wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 00:30:41 +0000 Received: by wibhq4 with SMTP id hq4so3733261wib.0 for ; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 17:30:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JnMQeSlih1QhN126StCW+ARTHUS8ZrRoNETeSKPkbSg=; b=noKG4vdJ/3esDNCfV8xUKdGB2rshkeqC9/byJ2lKJCmesPiXomsevfd/EOKjMMzCk7 PnB/P7czxNyxhSLBBf7kfLDGzlmxLO72hy/Tcrct/nOpOs1nEwLfCNrkfK6JtnqTvC9u 9HmvvYzw6IoPRX82SMe63sp2/KKaBM2+bGT0omx4+GHKogXThMAPr5cFSFlXjr+TUW70 HKh5vjBjUQbOLnoG0KK2rvQ732QCMeVvoitgrwCQtMaMJwAZRflgntFuB41uOs8kd8Y9 DtuZUxh1PO0UmjrjYFFf2q1Mh0KO+yk6rXVsioedq8yqJfgHfrZcI5WRlaMGYE6zgMbL OMaQ== Message-ID: <4FF38EA9.8000709@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 02:30:33 +0200 From: Xose Vazquez Perez MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1341350730-11037-1-git-send-email-xose.vazquez@gmail.com> <4FF38492.20003@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [wireless-regdb] [PATCH] wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for ES (Spain) on 5GHz and 2.4GHz List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: wireless-regdb-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: wireless-regdb-bounces+johannes=sipsolutions.net@lists.infradead.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com List-ID: On 07/04/2012 01:59 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > Please send a new patch and if you are going to convert something form > dBm to mW then please do that in *one* single patch so that it can > easily be read what changes you are *actually* making. That is one > patch to make a conversion in units that will not make any actual > changes, and then send another patch with all the verbiage you can use > to explain *why* you want the change you are making. You want the > commit log to have enough language so that if I forward the patch to a > regulatory person who has never read a patch they can read it. There was only one patch. The second mail was only a "Signed-off-by:", just in case. > The agreed upon "bar" for quality of regulatory patches was agreed > upon a while ago, for details see: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=128414096127554&w=2 Thank youuuuu http://wireless.kernel.org/en/developers/Regulatory#Mailing_list_for_regulatory_updates :-P > The more information you can provide the better. I believe I sent enough. -thanks- _______________________________________________ wireless-regdb mailing list wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless-regdb