From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756889Ab2GEQku (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2012 12:40:50 -0400 Received: from e7.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.137]:34959 "EHLO e7.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751000Ab2GEQkt (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2012 12:40:49 -0400 Message-ID: <4FF5C064.3040107@us.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 09:27:16 -0700 From: John Stultz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Prarit Bhargava CC: Linux Kernel , stable@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , linux@openhuawei.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3][RFC] Fix for leapsecond caused futex issue (v4) References: <1341382890-42324-1-git-send-email-johnstul@us.ibm.com> <4FF3E178.7000806@us.ibm.com> <4FF5A79E.9030703@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4FF5A79E.9030703@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 12070516-5806-0000-0000-000017018434 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/05/2012 07:41 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote: > I tested this patchset for ~22 hours without any issues using my own leap second > test code, John's previous leaptest.c and this new leap-a-day test with and > without the -s option. > > In all x86 systems' cases (both AMD and Intel, large cpu count[1] and small cpu > count) I also ran Firefox in the background and monitored it using top and > occasionally breaking in to check the status of the futexes. I haven't seen > anything wrong with any of the systems. > > John, my apologies for not getting to exactly 24 hours. I've usurped these > systems long enough and other people need them :/. I'm going to continue to run > two systems (one AMD and one Intel) for a longer stretch but I don't anticipate > any issues at this point. > > So ... > > Acked-by: Prarit Bhargava > > For the entire patchset. Thanks so much! I greatly appreciate the extra testing and review you've provided! -john