From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44334)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1So7um-0007cy-5l
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 02:57:49 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1So7uk-00030F-Hx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 02:57:47 -0400
Received: from mail-pb0-f45.google.com ([209.85.160.45]:54933)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1So7uk-000306-8g
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 02:57:46 -0400
Received: by pbbro12 with SMTP id ro12so20321694pbb.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 23:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4FFA80E2.4080707@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 08:57:38 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABg=H3POZP9sLToVYeakYd=3YaPyiS+CevTL8fHU0c-3GD95kQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAu8pHvFcFEaOkL3_QCA5uSRbxSSOEdZcfBg7wPo-5HPWpzK=Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAu8pHvFcFEaOkL3_QCA5uSRbxSSOEdZcfBg7wPo-5HPWpzK=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4 V3] Header with various utility
	functions shared
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: Deep Debroy <ddebroy@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Il 07/07/2012 09:56, Blue Swirl ha scritto:
> These don't seem useful. I think DMA accessors should also be used.

This is a paravirtualized device model, so I think no (like virtio).

I agree that this patch can be dropped and the functions inlined
manually in pvscsi.c (patch 4).

Paolo