All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gao feng <gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: nhorman@tuxdriver.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	lizefan@huawei.com, tj@kernel.org,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: cgroup: fix access the unallocated memory in netprio cgroup
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 17:36:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FFBF7B2.9070609@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1341911707.3265.4603.camel@edumazet-glaptop>

于 2012年07月10日 17:15, Eric Dumazet 写道:
> On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 16:53 +0800, Gao feng wrote:
>>> Hi Gao
>>>
>>> Is it still needed to call update_netdev_tables() from write_priomap() ?
>>>
>>
>> Yes, I think it's needed,because read_priomap will show all of the net devices,
>>
>> But we may add the netdev after create a netprio cgroup, so the new added netdev's
>> priomap will not be allocated. if we don't call update_netdev_tables in write_priomap,
>> we may access this unallocated memory.
>>
> 
> I realize my question was not clear.
> 
> If we write in write_priomap() a field of a single netdevice,
> why should we allocate memory for all netdevices on the machine ?
> 
> So the question was : Do we really need to call
> update_netdev_tables(alldevs), instead of extend_netdev_table(dev)
> 
> 

I get it.

You are right,Indeed we only need to call extend_netdev_table
for the netdev witch we want to change.

and I read the commit f5c38208d32412d72b97a4f0d44af0eb39feb20b,
found why we need delay allocation.

I will send a v2 patch.

Thanks!

      reply	other threads:[~2012-07-10  9:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-09  7:45 [PATCH] net: cgroup: fix out of bounds accesses Eric Dumazet
2012-07-09  8:15 ` Gao feng
2012-07-09 21:51   ` David Miller
2012-07-10  2:33     ` Gao feng
2012-07-10  2:37       ` David Miller
2012-07-09 11:01 ` Neil Horman
2012-07-09 11:50   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-09 12:13     ` Neil Horman
2012-07-09 12:40       ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-09 12:56         ` Neil Horman
2012-07-10  2:31         ` [PATCH] net: cgroup: fix access the unallocated memory in netprio cgroup Gao feng
2012-07-10  4:14           ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-10  8:53             ` Gao feng
2012-07-10  9:15               ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-10  9:36                 ` Gao feng [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FFBF7B2.9070609@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.