From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <fernando_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] fsfreeze: emergency thaw will deadlock on s_umount
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 11:38:21 +0900
Message-ID: <4FFCE71D.6010707@lab.ntt.co.jp>
References: <1341908216.11559.6.camel@nexus.lab.ntt.co.jp> <1341908615.11559.13.camel@nexus.lab.ntt.co.jp> <20120710090918.GA13539@quack.suse.cz> <20120710091352.GB13539@quack.suse.cz> <4FFBF633.1020004@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20120710121536.GE13539@quack.suse.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from tama50.ecl.ntt.co.jp ([129.60.39.147]:38064 "EHLO
	tama50.ecl.ntt.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752101Ab2GKCjf (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 10 Jul 2012 22:39:35 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20120710121536.GE13539@quack.suse.cz>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

Hi Jan,

On 2012/07/10 21:15, Jan Kara wrote:

> On Tue 10-07-12 18:30:27, Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao wrote:
>> Ok. I would appreciate if you could take a look at all the patches.
>    Except for patches 1 and 2 I'm basically OK with the series.

Thank you for reviewing the patches.

Hopefully my reply to your comments on patch 1 address your
concerns. By the way, is there anything specific in patch 2
(apart from the conditional locking ugliness) that you want
to me to change? Maybe resolve the conflicts with your patch
set?

>> By the way, do you want me to rebase on top of your tree?
>    It depends on how Al plans to handle my freezing fixes. I still don't
> see them in his tree. Al?

Ok. Could you get your Acked-by or Reviewed-by for the changes
you agree with?

Regards,
Fernando