From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Elder Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/16] rbd: dynamically allocate object prefix Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 14:17:59 -0500 Message-ID: <4FFDD167.6010602@inktank.com> References: <4FFD847C.7070205@inktank.com> <4FFD8750.7010407@inktank.com> <4FFDD014.9090208@inktank.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-yw0-f52.google.com ([209.85.213.52]:50050 "EHLO mail-yw0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932191Ab2GKTSA (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:18:00 -0400 Received: by yhpp61 with SMTP id p61so1856808yhp.11 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:18:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FFDD014.9090208@inktank.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Josh Durgin Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org On 07/11/2012 02:12 PM, Josh Durgin wrote: >> /* >> @@ -1711,15 +1721,17 @@ static int __rbd_refresh_header(struct >> rbd_device *rbd_dev) >> if head moves */ >> follow_seq = 1; >> >> - kfree(rbd_dev->header.snapc); >> - kfree(rbd_dev->header.snap_names); >> + kfree(rbd_dev->header.object_prefix); > > Object prefix isn't going to change, so it doesn't need to be reset > here. Otherwise looks good. In that case I will verify that and warn if they do differ. -Alex