From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <fernando_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] fsfreeze: Prevent emergency thaw from looping infinitely
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 10:49:21 +0900
Message-ID: <4FFE2D21.3060607@lab.ntt.co.jp>
References: <1341908216.11559.6.camel@nexus.lab.ntt.co.jp> <1341908457.11559.9.camel@nexus.lab.ntt.co.jp> <20120710120858.GD13539@quack.suse.cz> <4FFCE434.601@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20120711090230.GC1316@quack.suse.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from tama500.ecl.ntt.co.jp ([129.60.39.148]:49836 "EHLO
	tama500.ecl.ntt.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1756323Ab2GLBts (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 11 Jul 2012 21:49:48 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20120711090230.GC1316@quack.suse.cz>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On 2012/07/11 18:02, Jan Kara wrote:

>    Yes, after your patch thaw_bdev() returns EINVAL although the device is
> thawed. That is just wrong regardless whether any caller cares or not. And
> before your patch this was working correctly. So please fix your patch.

I will fix it for the next iteration of the patch set.

Thanks,
Fernando