From: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Hanumath Prasad <hanumath.prasad@stericsson.com>,
Per FORLIN <per.forlin@stericsson.com>,
Sebastian Rasmussen <sebras@gmail.com>,
"Dong, Chuanxiao" <chuanxiao.dong@intel.com>,
"svenkatr@ti.com" <svenkatr@ti.com>,
Saugata Das <saugata.das@linaro.org>,
Konstantin Dorfman <kdorfman@codeaurora.org>,
Maya Erez <merez@codeaurora.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@stericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] mmc: support BKOPS feature for eMMC
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:02:16 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FFE5A58.1060807@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FD9EB47.6000905@intel.com>
Hi, Adrian,
On 06/14/2012 10:46 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 08/06/12 07:39, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
>> Enable eMMC background operations (BKOPS) feature.
>>
>> If URGENT_BKOPS is set after a response, note that BKOPS
>> are required. After all I/O requests are finished, run
>> BKOPS if required. Should read/write operations be requested
>> during BKOPS, first issue HPI to interrupt the ongoing BKOPS
>> and then service the request.
>> If BKOPS-STATUS is upper than LEVEL2, need to check until clear
>> the BKOPS-STATUS vaule.
>>
>> If you want to enable this feature, set MMC_CAP2_BKOPS.
>> And if you want to set the BKOPS_EN bit in ext_csd register,
>> use the MMC_CAP2_INIT_BKOPS.
>>
>> Future considerations
>> * Check BKOPS_LEVEL=1 and start BKOPS in a preventive manner.
>> * Interrupt ongoing BKOPS before powering off the card.
>> * How get BKOPS_STATUS value.(periodically send ext_csd command?)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Dorfman <kdorfman@codeaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Maya Erez <merez@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>
> I would not expect this to work nicely with runtime PM. I expect that BKOPS
> would need to be stopped beforehand. But that would limit the time
> available for BKOPS since runtime PM would always kick in and stop it. How
> is runtime PM to be handled?
I think that add some function like the mmc_runtime_pm_suspend().
int mmc_runtime_pm_suspend()
{
if running bkops {
waiting for limit time..=> (when upper than Level2)
otherwise don't wait
stop-bkops
} else
nothing..
}
Almost runtime PM is controlled at host side.
So it's not very good that add the bkops control code at host side.
How about this? i want to get your opinion.
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-12 5:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-08 4:39 [PATCH v9] mmc: support BKOPS feature for eMMC Jaehoon Chung
2012-06-13 12:40 ` Dong, Chuanxiao
[not found] ` <17296D9F8FF2234F831FC3DF505A87A90FEA11E5@SHSMSX102.ccr.corp.intel.com >
2012-06-14 14:49 ` Konstantin Dorfman
2012-06-15 3:00 ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-06-13 13:53 ` S, Venkatraman
2012-06-14 8:44 ` merez
2012-06-15 4:29 ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-06-14 13:46 ` Adrian Hunter
2012-06-14 14:58 ` Konstantin Dorfman
2012-07-12 5:02 ` Jaehoon Chung [this message]
2012-07-12 6:00 ` Adrian Hunter
2012-07-12 6:50 ` Jaehoon Chung
[not found] ` <4FD88B7D.3000600@codeaurora.org>
2012-06-15 4:19 ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-06-15 6:10 ` Subhash Jadavani
2012-07-06 16:47 ` Chris Ball
2012-07-08 10:13 ` merez
2012-07-09 2:34 ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-07-09 2:48 ` Chris Ball
2012-07-09 4:14 ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-07-09 4:39 ` Chris Ball
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-06-12 10:58 merez
2012-06-13 3:07 ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-06-13 6:18 ` merez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FFE5A58.1060807@samsung.com \
--to=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=chuanxiao.dong@intel.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=hanumath.prasad@stericsson.com \
--cc=kdorfman@codeaurora.org \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=merez@codeaurora.org \
--cc=per.forlin@stericsson.com \
--cc=saugata.das@linaro.org \
--cc=sebras@gmail.com \
--cc=svenkatr@ti.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@stericsson.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.