From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ethdev: ensure consistent port id assignment
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 15:53:23 +0100
Message-ID: <4abb6aa8-7b3c-5c98-5cb5-3bfbdefac4ea@intel.com>
References: <5905C8E33883CA46A8878E2D7724E21516DF5D@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com>
 <68D830D942438745AD09BAFA99E33E812746D0@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <5905C8E33883CA46A8878E2D7724E215172927@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com>
 <29406326.BbypyUUmXA@xps13>
 <5905C8E33883CA46A8878E2D7724E21518CB6C@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: amin.tootoonchian@intel.com, Marcin Kerlin <marcinx.kerlin@intel.com>,
 Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD6D7CB9
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon,  4 Sep 2017 16:53:26 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <5905C8E33883CA46A8878E2D7724E21518CB6C@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi,

On 24/08/2016 23:17, amin.tootoonchian at intel.com (Tootoonchian, Amin) 
wrote:
> Sergio, could you please review this patch?
>
> Thanks,
> Amin

The patch status should be updated to 'Not Applicable' since similar 
functionality has been implemented (commit d948f596).
Only Primary processes are allowed to call rte_eth_dev_allocate(), while 
Secondary processes should call rte_eth_dev_attach_secondary()

Thanks,
Sergio

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 8:12 AM
>> To: Tootoonchian, Amin <amin.tootoonchian at intel.com>
>> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Kerlin, MarcinX <marcinx.kerlin at intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: ensure consistent port id assignment
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2016-07-20 15:07, Tootoonchian, Amin:
>>> Thomas, your thoughts?
>> I have 2 thoughts:
>> - it is too big for 16.07
>> - it is related to multi-process mechanism, maintained by Sergio ;)
>>
>> Sorry I won't look at it shortly.