From: Xin Zhao <uszhaoxin@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: NFS2 question, help, pls!
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 15:22:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ae3c1405041212223ee0609e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
I have very very fast network and is testing NFS2 over this kind of
network. I noticed that for standard work like read/write a large
file, compile kernels, the performance of NFS2 is good. But if I try
to decompress kernel tar file. The standard ext2 takes 28s while NFS2
takes 81s. Also, if I remove the kernel source code tree, ext2 takes
19s but NFS2 takes 44s.
Why? (You can assume that network is very fast. ) Is there any
improvements in NFS3/4 on this issue? If so, how?
Many thanks in advance for your kind help!
xin
next reply other threads:[~2005-04-12 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-12 19:22 Xin Zhao [this message]
2005-04-12 22:26 ` NFS2 question, help, pls! Trond Myklebust
2005-04-12 23:10 ` Lee Revell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ae3c1405041212223ee0609e@mail.gmail.com \
--to=uszhaoxin@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.