From: "Dâniel Fraga" <fragabr@gmail.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ICH10 not working with AHCI kernel option
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 06:12:52 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4bbeef97.6202be0a.13e4.166e@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100409100833.666f64f1@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 10:08:33 +0100
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> You also don't get the CPU having to handle each command itself and poke
> the drive which causes signficiant stalls (doubly so because Jeff Garzik
> hasn't applied my patches to fix the bogus ones yet ;))
>
> So not only do you get 64bit DMA and NCQ but the inter command delay is
> lower so its faster overall. You also get less CPU stalls for I/O which
> can be very slow with legacy mode although it usually only upsets real
> time people.
Interesting. With my old motherboard (sata_nv) I used to have
some stalls, mainly on GTK+ apps like Claws-mail during intense I/O
and Firefox. Now with AHCI it's barely noticeable, but it happens too,
although not as frequent as it used to happen with sata_nv.
I hope your patches get applied soon.
--
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-09 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-08 13:36 ICH10 not working with AHCI kernel option Dâniel Fraga
2010-04-08 13:45 ` Alan Cox
2010-04-08 13:46 ` Dâniel Fraga
2010-04-08 13:59 ` Alan Cox
2010-04-08 14:02 ` Dâniel Fraga
2010-04-08 14:09 ` Alan Cox
2010-04-08 14:15 ` Dâniel Fraga
2010-04-08 23:54 ` Robert Hancock
2010-04-09 2:00 ` Dâniel Fraga
2010-04-09 2:09 ` Robert Hancock
2010-04-09 2:22 ` Dâniel Fraga
2010-04-09 2:52 ` Robert Hancock
2010-04-09 3:16 ` Dâniel Fraga
2010-04-09 10:12 ` Tim Small
2010-04-09 14:47 ` Robert Hancock
2010-04-09 15:07 ` Alan Cox
2010-04-09 16:37 ` Tim Small
2010-04-09 18:53 ` Alan Cox
2010-04-09 23:04 ` Robert Hancock
2010-04-09 4:28 ` Jeff Garzik
2010-04-09 9:16 ` Alan Cox
2010-04-09 9:08 ` Alan Cox
2010-04-09 9:12 ` Dâniel Fraga [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4bbeef97.6202be0a.13e4.166e@mx.google.com \
--to=fragabr@gmail.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.