From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D288C2D0A3 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 20:36:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 931E6206D8 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 20:36:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="XYMgxZAU" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 931E6206D8 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CVN8004BjzDqhN for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 07:36:48 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=anoo@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=XYMgxZAU; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CVN6R2DYFzDqSs for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 07:35:25 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0A9KX72t004403; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 15:35:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=mime-version : date : from : to : cc : subject : in-reply-to : references : message-id : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=eROCupqTrvCQzai5OWuS5v8b7QjEn1UIVwnHSx96GKU=; b=XYMgxZAUS0/Al4pQyq09TAI30wFdaE+3709fRZ/zsakl0w7ij5wiW1aX8KK75ECYfeHc sHE/eqjDiksM/oxbsYE4ISbE2IWTAQ17OrVPYkfgIf5iZorld5RLmylt5i/62cd14Nmh sNp1btlPsWJaDQEkmAsUhJ8Brb0zSRTIksZ71F9KmV0H1t8fqZLDuCxs1vVfsR+sWhE5 b3V92nm1jta3ENG0SGySXO6qGv4nl+XROmFK+uaODOfYuCeFBJUwo2THE8+VzlNVtca2 zsoMnMdlNhV0h0xqcjKC+LF1KY+BOD0XqROSYRD4ASrd2K5ouZOhtSufJbuHML0xE3DT ag== Received: from ppma02dal.us.ibm.com (a.bd.3ea9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.62.189.10]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 34qa2nx058-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 09 Nov 2020 15:35:17 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma02dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma02dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0A9KVkuL012435; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 20:35:17 GMT Received: from b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.17]) by ppma02dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 34nk797sv5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 09 Nov 2020 20:35:17 +0000 Received: from b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.237]) by b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 0A9KZ8wX8716802 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 9 Nov 2020 20:35:08 GMT Received: from b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 219A5C6062; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 20:35:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD168C6055; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 20:35:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ltc.linux.ibm.com (unknown [9.16.170.189]) by b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 20:35:13 +0000 (GMT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 14:35:13 -0600 From: Adriana Kobylak To: Patrick Williams Subject: Re: Multi host bios upgrade support in phosphor-bmc-code-mgmt: In-Reply-To: <20201103210149.GB38269@patrickw3-mbp.lan.stwcx.xyz> References: <893bbe2bbfe35c6ccdea0988c8ec1de9@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <8EF4ECDB-2EA4-4620-B7EE-FBB899FD1C47@fb.com> <219FD10A-97C2-4876-94B0-23D548A6D7B6@fb.com> <20201103210149.GB38269@patrickw3-mbp.lan.stwcx.xyz> Message-ID: <4c2b7022e3ac7f82849efd2c92db3e4f@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Sender: anoo@linux.ibm.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.312, 18.0.737 definitions=2020-11-09_12:2020-11-05, 2020-11-09 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=725 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2011090133 X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "P. Priyatharshan" , openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org, anoo@us.ibm.com, ojayanth@in.ibm.com, gmills@linux.vnet.ibm.com, "Velumani T-ERS, HCLTech" , Vijay Khemka , ratagupt@linux.vnet.ibm.com Errors-To: openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "openbmc" On 2020-11-03 15:01, Patrick Williams wrote: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 01:52:32PM -0500, Adriana Kobylak wrote: >> I'd suggest filling up a design document template[1]. > > Agreed. I tried looking back at the discussion and I'm not sure what > the remaining open issues are here to give additional feedback on. A > design proposal and summary of the outstanding questions would help > give direction to where we still need solutions before you can proceed. > > Feel free to spell out "Open Issues: ..." right in a design proposal > and > we can work through that in review or defer back to the mailing list > for > discussion on the specifics. For anyone interested, design doc: https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/docs/+/37950