All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>
To: "Michal Vokáč" <michal.vokac@ysoft.com>,
	"Lee Jones" <lee@kernel.org>, "Pavel Machek" <pavel@kernel.org>
Cc: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>,
	linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC RESEND] leds: lp55xx: led-cur property is not properly applied to multi-led
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 20:02:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4cca1f41-e3ab-467c-867f-84b26dc03159@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250523093142.1498846-1-michal.vokac@ysoft.com>

Hi Michal,

On 5/23/25 11:31, Michal Vokáč wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am trying to wrap my head around the implementation of the multicolor
> LED support in the lp55xx family drivers.
> 
> The situation is quite straight forward when each LED is registered
> and controlled individually but it gets quite messy once you use
> the multi-color LED binding.
> 
> I am working with the imx6dl-yapp43-pegasus.dts board (in-tree). There
> is one RGB LED driven by a LP5562 LED controller. Currently the RGB LED
> is modeled as three separate LEDs and each of the LEDs has
> individually tuned led-cur property. I would like to change the device
> tree and use the multi-led binding to be able to use triggers on a chosen
> RGB color.
> 
> When I was experimenting with that, I realized there is something wrong
> with the colors and identified that the led-cur property is not properly
> applied in case the multi-led binding is used. What ultimately happens is
> that the led_current of the first LED in the multi-led group is set to
> the value of led-cur property of the last LED in the group.
> All the other LEDs in the group are left with the default reset value
> of the controller (0xaf in my case).
> 
> Example:
> 
> led-controller@30 {
> 	compatible = "ti,lp5562";
> 	reg = <0x30>;
> 	clock-mode = /bits/ 8 <1>;
> 	#address-cells = <1>;
> 	#size-cells = <0>;
> 	status = "disabled";
> 
> 	multi-led@0 {
> 		#address-cells = <1>;
> 		#size-cells = <0>;
> 		color = <LED_COLOR_ID_RGB>;
> 		function = LED_FUNCTION_INDICATOR;
> 
> 		led@0 {
> 			led-cur = /bits/ 8 <0x6e>;
> 			max-cur = /bits/ 8 <0xc8>;
> 			reg = <0>;
> 			color = <LED_COLOR_ID_RED>;
> 		};
> 
> 		led@1 {
> 			led-cur = /bits/ 8 <0xbe>;
> 			max-cur = /bits/ 8 <0xc8>;
> 			reg = <1>;
> 			color = <LED_COLOR_ID_GREEN>;
> 		};
> 
> 		led@2 {
> 			led-cur = /bits/ 8 <0xbe>;
> 			max-cur = /bits/ 8 <0xc8>;
> 			reg = <2>;
> 			color = <LED_COLOR_ID_BLUE>;
> 		};
> 	};
> 
> Result (values read out directly with i2cget)
> 
> led@0 current = 0xbe, should be 0x6e
> led@1 current = 0xaf, should be 0xbe
> led@2 current = 0xaf, should be 0xbe
> 
> I tried to describe the steps that led to my discovery in the comments to
> the file. Unfortunately I could not really figure out how this could be
> properly fixed.
> 
> I would appreciate any comments to this problem and hopefully some ideas
> how it could be solved.
> 
> Thank you,
> Michal
> ---
>   drivers/leds/leds-lp55xx-common.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-lp55xx-common.c b/drivers/leds/leds-lp55xx-common.c
> index e71456a56ab8..d2fd2d296049 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-lp55xx-common.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-lp55xx-common.c
> @@ -1060,12 +1060,17 @@ static int lp55xx_register_leds(struct lp55xx_led *led, struct lp55xx_chip *chip
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   	}
>   
> +	// Step 8
> +	// num_channels = 1
>   	for (i = 0; i < num_channels; i++) {
>   
>   		/* do not initialize channels that are not connected */
>   		if (pdata->led_config[i].led_current == 0)
>   			continue;
>   
> +		// The pdata->led_config[0].led_current contains the led-cur
> +		// property value of the last LED from the multi-led node.
> +		// Here we store that value to the first LED in that node.
>   		led_current = pdata->led_config[i].led_current;
>   		each = led + i;
>   		ret = lp55xx_init_led(each, chip, i);
> @@ -1119,8 +1124,16 @@ static int lp55xx_parse_common_child(struct device_node *np,
>   				     struct lp55xx_led_config *cfg,
>   				     int led_number, int *chan_nr)
>   {
> +	// Step 6
> +	// This is called 3-times (n-times in general, for each LED in the multi-led node)
> +	// led_number = 0
> +	// np = led@[0,1,2]
>   	int ret;
>   
> +	// Size of the cfg is "1 lp55xx_led_config"
> +	// led_number = 0 for each of the n-calls
> +	// So the name, led_current and max_current variables are being
> +	// overwritten until values from the last led@ subnode are stored.

It seems that struct lp55xx_led_config needs an improvement to be
capable of storing led-cur and max-cur per multi-subLEDs.

Probably there should be added a pointer property that will be
dynamically allocated either to a single element, or for multi-color
LEDs to multiple elements.

Let's say:

struct lp55xx_sub_led {
     u8 led_current;  /* mA x10, 0 if led is not connected */
     u8 max_current;
     int color_id;
     int output_num;
}

struct lp55xx_led_config {
     const char *name;
     const char *default_trigger;
     u8 chan_nr;
     int num_colors;
     unsigned int max_channel;
     struct lp55xx_sub_led *leds;
};

Then lp55xx_parse_common_child() will need to accept also subLED id.
For monochrome LEDs it will be always 0.

>   	of_property_read_string(np, "chan-name",
>   				&cfg[led_number].name);
>   	of_property_read_u8(np, "led-cur",
> @@ -1139,6 +1152,11 @@ static int lp55xx_parse_multi_led_child(struct device_node *child,
>   					 struct lp55xx_led_config *cfg,
>   					 int child_number, int color_number)
>   {
> +	// Step 5
> +	// This is called 3-times (n-times in general, for each LED in the multi-led node)
> +	// child_number = 0
> +	// color_number = [0,1,2]
> +	// child = led@[0,1,2]
>   	int chan_nr, color_id, ret;
>   
>   	ret = lp55xx_parse_common_child(child, cfg, child_number, &chan_nr);
> @@ -1159,6 +1177,10 @@ static int lp55xx_parse_multi_led(struct device_node *np,
>   				  struct lp55xx_led_config *cfg,
>   				  int child_number)
>   {
> +	// Step 4
> +	// This is called just once
> +	// child_number = 0
> +	// np = multi-led node
>   	int num_colors = 0, ret;
>   
>   	for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped(np, child) {
> @@ -1169,6 +1191,7 @@ static int lp55xx_parse_multi_led(struct device_node *np,
>   		num_colors++;
>   	}
>   
> +	// num_colors = 3
>   	cfg[child_number].num_colors = num_colors;
>   
>   	return 0;
> @@ -1178,6 +1201,10 @@ static int lp55xx_parse_logical_led(struct device_node *np,
>   				   struct lp55xx_led_config *cfg,
>   				   int child_number)
>   {
> +	// Step 3
> +	// This is called just once
> +	// child_number = 0
> +	// np = multi-led node
>   	int led_color, ret;
>   	int chan_nr = 0;
>   
> @@ -1189,6 +1216,7 @@ static int lp55xx_parse_logical_led(struct device_node *np,
>   		return ret;
>   
>   	if (led_color == LED_COLOR_ID_RGB)
> +		// We go this way
>   		return lp55xx_parse_multi_led(np, cfg, child_number);
>   
>   	ret =  lp55xx_parse_common_child(np, cfg, child_number, &chan_nr);
> @@ -1215,18 +1243,22 @@ static struct lp55xx_platform_data *lp55xx_of_populate_pdata(struct device *dev,
>   	if (!pdata)
>   		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>   
> +	// Step 2
> +	// One RGB multiled, num_channels = 1
>   	num_channels = of_get_available_child_count(np);
>   	if (num_channels == 0) {
>   		dev_err(dev, "no LED channels\n");
>   		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>   	}
>   
> +	dev_err(dev, "LED channels: %d\n", num_channels);
>   	cfg = devm_kcalloc(dev, num_channels, sizeof(*cfg), GFP_KERNEL);
>   	if (!cfg)
>   		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>   
>   	pdata->led_config = &cfg[0];
>   	pdata->num_channels = num_channels;
> +	// LP5562 max_channel = 4
>   	cfg->max_channel = chip->cfg->max_channel;
>   
>   	for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child) {
> @@ -1277,6 +1309,7 @@ int lp55xx_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>   
>   	if (!pdata) {
>   		if (np) {
> +			// Step 1
>   			pdata = lp55xx_of_populate_pdata(&client->dev, np,
>   							 chip);
>   			if (IS_ERR(pdata))
> @@ -1316,6 +1349,7 @@ int lp55xx_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>   
>   	dev_info(&client->dev, "%s Programmable led chip found\n", id->name);
>   
> +	// Step 7
>   	ret = lp55xx_register_leds(led, chip);
>   	if (ret)
>   		goto err_out;

-- 
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski


      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-19 18:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-23  9:31 [RFC RESEND] leds: lp55xx: led-cur property is not properly applied to multi-led Michal Vokáč
2025-06-12 13:48 ` Lee Jones
2025-06-17 13:48   ` Michal Vokáč
2025-06-19 18:02 ` Jacek Anaszewski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4cca1f41-e3ab-467c-867f-84b26dc03159@gmail.com \
    --to=jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com \
    --cc=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.vokac@ysoft.com \
    --cc=pavel@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.