From: Chris Goldsworthy <cgoldswo@codeaurora.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] fs/buffer.c: Revoke LRU when trying to drop buffers
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 00:28:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4d034ea4228be568db62243bfe238e0d@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210127025922.GS308988@casper.infradead.org>
On 2021-01-26 18:59, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 02:59:17PM -0800, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> The release buffer_head in LRU is great improvement for migration
>> point of view.
>>
>> A question:
Hey guys,
>> Can't we invalidate(e.g., invalidate_bh_lrus) bh_lru in migrate_prep
>> or
>> elsewhere when migration found the failure and is about to retry?
>>
>> Migration has done such a way for other per-cpu stuffs for a long
>> time,
>> which would be more consistent with others and might be faster
>> sometimes
>> with reducing IPI calls for page.
> Should lru_add_drain_all() also handle draining the buffer lru for all
> callers? A quick survey ...
>
> invalidate_bdev() already calls invalidate_bh_lrus()
> compact_nodes() would probably benefit from the BH LRU being
> invalidated
> POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED would benefit if the underlying filesystem uses BHs
> check_and_migrate_cma_pages() would benefit
> khugepaged_do_scan() doesn't need it today
> scan_get_next_rmap_item() looks like it only works on anon pages (?) so
> doesn't need it
> mem_cgroup_force_empty() probably needs it
> mem_cgroup_move_charge() ditto
> memfd_wait_for_pins() doesn't need it
> shake_page() might benefit
> offline_pages() would benefit
> alloc_contig_range() would benefit
>
> Seems like most would benefit and a few won't care. I think I'd lean
> towards having lru_add_drain_all() call invalidate_bh_lrus(), just to
> simplify things.
Doing this sounds like a good idea. We would still need a call to
invalidate_bh_lrus() inside of drop_buffers() in the event that we find
busy buffers, since they can be re-added back into the BH LRU - I
believe
it isn't until this point that a BH can't be added back into the BH LRU,
when we acquire the private_lock for the mapping:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.10.10/source/fs/buffer.c#L3240
Thanks,
Chris.
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-28 8:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-26 6:58 [PATCH v4] Resolve LRU page-pinning issue for file-backed pages Chris Goldsworthy
2021-01-26 6:58 ` [PATCH v4] fs/buffer.c: Revoke LRU when trying to drop buffers Chris Goldsworthy
2021-01-26 22:59 ` Minchan Kim
2021-01-27 2:59 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-01-27 17:01 ` Minchan Kim
2021-01-28 8:28 ` Chris Goldsworthy [this message]
2021-01-28 17:08 ` Minchan Kim
2021-01-28 18:43 ` Chris Goldsworthy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4d034ea4228be568db62243bfe238e0d@codeaurora.org \
--to=cgoldswo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=lauraa@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.