From: Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: kernel@kolivas.org, solt2@dns.toxicfilms.tv,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Trying out SCHED_BATCH
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 08:36:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4d8e3fd304122923362d823e34@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041229232028.055f8786.akpm@osdl.org>
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 23:20:28 -0800, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Andrew,
> > what's your plan for the staircase scheduler ?
>
> I have none, frankly. I haven't seen any complaints about the current
> scheduler.
>
> If someone can identify bad behaviour in the current scheduler which
> staircase improves then please describe a tescase which the scheduler
> developers can use to reproduce the situation.
>
> If, after that, we deem that the problem cannot be feasibly fixed within the
> context of the current scheduler and that the problem is sufficiently
> serious to justify wholesale replacement of the scheduler then sure,
> staircase is an option.
Your answer makes lot of sense.
I think Con can explain the pro and cons of the staircase scheduler.
Best,
--
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-30 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-25 11:31 Trying out SCHED_BATCH Rajsekar
2004-12-25 11:41 ` Con Kolivas
2004-12-29 20:14 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2004-12-29 20:28 ` Con Kolivas
2004-12-29 22:46 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2004-12-29 22:56 ` Con Kolivas
2004-12-30 7:12 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2004-12-30 7:20 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-30 7:36 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi [this message]
2004-12-30 7:41 ` Con Kolivas
2004-12-30 16:16 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-01-02 0:26 ` Peter Williams
2004-12-25 11:46 ` Matan Peled
2004-12-25 18:45 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-12-25 23:09 ` Con Kolivas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4d8e3fd304122923362d823e34@mail.gmail.com \
--to=paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=solt2@dns.toxicfilms.tv \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.