From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@assyoma.it>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: No I/O errors reported after SATA link hard reset
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 16:15:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4debd4d8dea1d534ef555ceae4429435@assyoma.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170817124821.GA3238792@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com>
Hi Tejun,
Il 17-08-2017 14:48 Tejun Heo ha scritto:
> Recovered errors aren't reported as IO errors and at least from link
> state proper there's no way for the driver to tell apart link
> glitches and buffer-erasing power issues.
Ok, so *this* is the root cause of the problem: libata not identifying
spurious link renegotiations vs brief powerloss/powerup events. Out of
curiosity: is this a SATA-specific problem (ie: in the SATA
specification), or even SAS disks are affected?
>> > - why the scsi midlevel does not respond to a power loss event by
>> > immediately offlining the disks?
>
> Because we don't wanna be ditching disks on temporary link glitches,
> which do happen once in a while.
Any chances to report I/O errors to the upper layers *without* offlining
the device? In this manner, upper layers (ie: MDRAID) can act in a more
informate way. For example: single disk device will simple retry the
failed operation, while MDRAID can take the "badblocks" code path to
deal with the error.
> So, the right way to deal with the problem probably is making use of
> the SMART counter which indicates power loss events and verify that
> the counter hasn't increased over link issues. If it changed, the
> device should be detached and re-probed, which will make it come back
> as a different block device. Unfortunately, I haven't had the chance
> to actually implement that.
This is a very good idea, maybe I can implement it in userspace with a
simple, fast polling scheme (for example, each 60 seconds). Such a
polling would not prevent all corruption scenarios, but will at least
timely inform the user.
Thanks.
--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.danti@assyoma.it - info@assyoma.it
GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-17 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-16 22:27 No I/O errors reported after SATA link hard reset Gionatan Danti
2017-08-17 9:24 ` Bernd Schubert
2017-08-17 12:48 ` Tejun Heo
2017-08-17 13:18 ` Bernd Schubert
2017-08-17 13:25 ` Tejun Heo
2017-08-17 13:43 ` Bernd Schubert
2017-08-17 14:23 ` Gionatan Danti
2017-08-17 14:15 ` Gionatan Danti [this message]
2017-08-17 14:46 ` Tejun Heo
2017-08-17 15:01 ` Gionatan Danti
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-08-26 20:58 sonofagun
2017-08-27 18:42 ` Gionatan Danti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4debd4d8dea1d534ef555ceae4429435@assyoma.it \
--to=g.danti@assyoma.it \
--cc=bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.