From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve M Bibayoff <smb23@csufresno.edu>
Subject: Re: Microsoft PPTP VPN server behind FIREWALL
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 12:46:16 -0800
Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
Message-ID: <4e48f84e6eb8.4e6eb84e48f8@cvip.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Return-path: <netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org>
Content-language: en
Content-Disposition: inline
Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org

Hello,

davidsen@tmr.com (bill davidsen) wrote:

> I believe there is a userspace IPsec package,
reasonably high overhead
> but runable where a patched kernel is politacally
incorrect. Does that
> ring a bell with anyone?

I believe your thinking of Cipe.

hth

Steve

ps. please don't Bcc the ml.