All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@meta.com>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests: bpf: validate CHECKSUM_COMPLETE option
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 17:23:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ed19773-2a26-4652-bd62-0fc0e5c1233e@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <08fda54a-f45e-7140-e5e8-fe2c3542547f@iogearbox.net>

On 24/05/2024 17:18, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 5/24/24 1:06 PM, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
>> Adjust skb program test to run with checksum validation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@meta.com>
> 
> BPF CI complains :
> 
>    [...]
>    
> /tmp/work/bpf/bpf/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_skb_pkt_end.c:14:12: error: call to undeclared function 'BIT'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>       14 |                 .flags = BPF_F_TEST_SKB_CHECKSUM_COMPLETE,
>          |                          ^
>    /tmp/work/bpf/bpf/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h:1429:42: note: 
> expanded from macro 'BPF_F_TEST_SKB_CHECKSUM_COMPLETE'
>     1429 | #define BPF_F_TEST_SKB_CHECKSUM_COMPLETE        BIT(2)
>          |                                                 ^
>    1 error generated.
>    make: *** [Makefile:654: 
> /tmp/work/bpf/bpf/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_skb_pkt_end.test.o] 
> Error 1
>    make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>    make: Leaving directory '/tmp/work/bpf/bpf/tools/testing/selftests/bpf'
>    Error: Process completed with exit code 2.

Oops, looks like checkpatch.pl was too smart and replaced original
define with BIT() macro, but in one file only. I'll re-send it with
fixes.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-24 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-24 11:06 [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf: add CHECKSUM_COMPLETE to bpf test progs Vadim Fedorenko
2024-05-24 11:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests: bpf: validate CHECKSUM_COMPLETE option Vadim Fedorenko
2024-05-24 16:18   ` Daniel Borkmann
2024-05-24 16:23     ` Vadim Fedorenko [this message]
2024-05-24 16:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf: add CHECKSUM_COMPLETE to bpf test progs Daniel Borkmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4ed19773-2a26-4652-bd62-0fc0e5c1233e@linux.dev \
    --to=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vadfed@meta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.