From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: Chengkaitao <pilgrimtao@gmail.com>,
martin.lau@linux.dev, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com,
jolsa@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, chengkaitao@kylinos.cn,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 5/5] bpf: refactor kfunc checks using table-driven approach in verifier
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 14:45:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f18c782-a09e-4584-8abb-0c81265840ad@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260308134614.29711-6-pilgrimtao@gmail.com>
On 8/3/26 21:46, Chengkaitao wrote:
> From: Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
>
> Replace per-kfunc btf_id chains in list/rbtree/res_lock and graph node
> checks with btf_id_in_kfunc_table() and static kfunc tables for easier
> maintenance.
>
Such refactoring should be the first patch? Less churn. Then, update the
list only.
However, is_bpf_rbtree_api_kfunc(), is_bpf_res_spin_lock_kfunc(), and
BPF_RB_NODE should be excluded, because you didn't touch them in this
series.
Thanks,
Leon
> Signed-off-by: Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 5e32e02429c4..853716f599ce 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -12602,6 +12602,62 @@ BTF_ID(func, bpf_session_is_return)
> BTF_ID(func, bpf_stream_vprintk)
> BTF_ID(func, bpf_stream_print_stack)
>
> +static const enum special_kfunc_type bpf_list_api_kfuncs[] = {
> + KF_bpf_list_push_front_impl,
> + KF_bpf_list_push_back_impl,
> + KF_bpf_list_add_impl,
> + KF_bpf_list_pop_front,
> + KF_bpf_list_pop_back,
> + KF_bpf_list_del,
> + KF_bpf_list_front,
> + KF_bpf_list_back,
> + KF_bpf_list_is_first,
> + KF_bpf_list_is_last,
> + KF_bpf_list_empty,
> +};
> +
> +/* Kfuncs that take a list node argument (bpf_list_node *). */
> +static const enum special_kfunc_type bpf_list_node_api_kfuncs[] = {
> + KF_bpf_list_push_front_impl,
> + KF_bpf_list_push_back_impl,
> + KF_bpf_list_add_impl,
> + KF_bpf_list_del,
> + KF_bpf_list_is_first,
> + KF_bpf_list_is_last,
> +};
> +
> +/* Kfuncs that take an rbtree node argument (bpf_rb_node *). */
> +static const enum special_kfunc_type bpf_rbtree_node_api_kfuncs[] = {
> + KF_bpf_rbtree_remove,
> + KF_bpf_rbtree_add_impl,
> + KF_bpf_rbtree_left,
> + KF_bpf_rbtree_right,
> +};
> +
> +static const enum special_kfunc_type bpf_rbtree_api_kfuncs[] = {
> + KF_bpf_rbtree_add_impl,
> + KF_bpf_rbtree_remove,
> + KF_bpf_rbtree_first,
> + KF_bpf_rbtree_root,
> + KF_bpf_rbtree_left,
> + KF_bpf_rbtree_right,
> +};
> +
> +static const enum special_kfunc_type bpf_res_spin_lock_kfuncs[] = {
> + KF_bpf_res_spin_lock,
> + KF_bpf_res_spin_unlock,
> + KF_bpf_res_spin_lock_irqsave,
> + KF_bpf_res_spin_unlock_irqrestore,
> +};
> +
> +static bool btf_id_in_kfunc_table(u32 btf_id, const enum special_kfunc_type *kfuncs, int n)
> +{
> + for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
> + if (btf_id == special_kfunc_list[kfuncs[i]])
> + return true;
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static bool is_task_work_add_kfunc(u32 func_id)
> {
> return func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_task_work_schedule_signal] ||
> @@ -13002,27 +13058,14 @@ static int check_reg_allocation_locked(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_
>
> static bool is_bpf_list_api_kfunc(u32 btf_id)
> {
> - return btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_push_front_impl] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_push_back_impl] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_add_impl] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_pop_front] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_pop_back] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_del] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_front] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_back] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_is_first] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_is_last] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_empty];
> + return btf_id_in_kfunc_table(btf_id, bpf_list_api_kfuncs,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_list_api_kfuncs));
> }
>
> static bool is_bpf_rbtree_api_kfunc(u32 btf_id)
> {
> - return btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_rbtree_add_impl] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_rbtree_remove] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_rbtree_first] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_rbtree_root] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_rbtree_left] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_rbtree_right];
> + return btf_id_in_kfunc_table(btf_id, bpf_rbtree_api_kfuncs,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_rbtree_api_kfuncs));
> }
>
> static bool is_bpf_iter_num_api_kfunc(u32 btf_id)
> @@ -13040,10 +13083,8 @@ static bool is_bpf_graph_api_kfunc(u32 btf_id)
>
> static bool is_bpf_res_spin_lock_kfunc(u32 btf_id)
> {
> - return btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_res_spin_lock] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_res_spin_unlock] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_res_spin_lock_irqsave] ||
> - btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_res_spin_unlock_irqrestore];
> + return btf_id_in_kfunc_table(btf_id, bpf_res_spin_lock_kfuncs,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_res_spin_lock_kfuncs));
> }
>
> static bool is_bpf_arena_kfunc(u32 btf_id)
> @@ -13132,18 +13173,12 @@ static bool check_kfunc_is_graph_node_api(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
>
> switch (node_field_type) {
> case BPF_LIST_NODE:
> - ret = (kfunc_btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_push_front_impl] ||
> - kfunc_btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_push_back_impl] ||
> - kfunc_btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_add_impl] ||
> - kfunc_btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_del] ||
> - kfunc_btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_is_first] ||
> - kfunc_btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_is_last]);
> + ret = btf_id_in_kfunc_table(kfunc_btf_id, bpf_list_node_api_kfuncs,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_list_node_api_kfuncs));
> break;
> case BPF_RB_NODE:
> - ret = (kfunc_btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_rbtree_remove] ||
> - kfunc_btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_rbtree_add_impl] ||
> - kfunc_btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_rbtree_left] ||
> - kfunc_btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_rbtree_right]);
> + ret = btf_id_in_kfunc_table(kfunc_btf_id, bpf_rbtree_node_api_kfuncs,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_rbtree_node_api_kfuncs));
> break;
> default:
> verbose(env, "verifier internal error: unexpected graph node argument type %s\n",
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-09 6:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-08 13:46 [PATCH bpf-next v7 0/5] bpf: Extend the bpf_list family of APIs Chengkaitao
2026-03-08 13:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 1/5] bpf: Introduce the bpf_list_del kfunc Chengkaitao
2026-03-09 6:33 ` Leon Hwang
2026-03-10 20:10 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-03-10 20:28 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-03-08 13:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 2/5] bpf: Add bpf_list_add_impl to insert node after a given list node Chengkaitao
2026-03-08 14:25 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-03-09 6:34 ` Leon Hwang
2026-03-10 20:10 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-03-08 13:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 3/5] bpf: add bpf_list_is_first/last/empty kfuncs Chengkaitao
2026-03-09 6:42 ` Leon Hwang
2026-03-08 13:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 4/5] selftests/bpf: Add test cases for bpf_list_del/add/is_first/is_last/empty Chengkaitao
2026-03-08 14:25 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-03-09 6:43 ` Leon Hwang
2026-03-10 2:05 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-03-08 13:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 5/5] bpf: refactor kfunc checks using table-driven approach in verifier Chengkaitao
2026-03-09 6:45 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2026-03-10 20:10 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-03-11 5:36 ` Leon Hwang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4f18c782-a09e-4584-8abb-0c81265840ad@linux.dev \
--to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chengkaitao@kylinos.cn \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=pilgrimtao@gmail.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.