All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Derrick <jonathan.derrick@linux.dev>
To: Klaus Jensen <its@irrelevant.dk>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@nvidia.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tests/nvme: Add admin-passthru+reset race test
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 13:30:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f3c32a5-54cf-dcba-afe2-1f08b3f48b16@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y3yHvg27tKo11YCF@cormorant.local>



On 11/22/2022 1:26 AM, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> On Nov 21 16:04, Keith Busch wrote:
>> [cc'ing Klaus]
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 03:49:45PM -0700, Jonathan Derrick wrote:
>>> On 11/21/2022 3:34 PM, Jonathan Derrick wrote:
>>>> On 11/21/2022 1:55 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 02:22:10PM -0700, Jonathan Derrick wrote:
>>>>>> I seem to have isolated the error mechanism for older kernels, but 6.2.0-rc2
>>>>>> reliably segfaults my QEMU instance (something else to look into) and I don't
>>>>>> have any 'real' hardware to test this on at the moment. It looks like several
>>>>>> passthru commands are able to enqueue prior/during/after resetting/connecting.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not seeing any problem with the latest nvme-qemu after several dozen
>>>>> iterations of this test case. In that environment, the formats and
>>>>> resets complete practically synchronously with the call, so everything
>>>>> proceeds quickly. Is there anything special I need to change?
>>>>>  
>>>> I can still repro this with nvme-fixes tag, so I'll have to dig into it myself
>>> Here's a backtrace:
>>>
>>> Thread 1 "qemu-system-x86" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>>> [Switching to Thread 0x7ffff7554400 (LWP 531154)]
>>> 0x000055555597a9d5 in nvme_ctrl (req=0x7fffec892780) at ../hw/nvme/nvme.h:539
>>> 540         return sq->ctrl;
>>> (gdb) backtrace
>>> #0  0x000055555597a9d5 in nvme_ctrl (req=0x7fffec892780) at ../hw/nvme/nvme.h:539
>>> #1  0x0000555555994360 in nvme_format_bh (opaque=0x5555579dd000) at ../hw/nvme/ctrl.c:5852
>>
>> Thanks, looks like a race between the admin queue format's bottom half,
>> and the controller reset tearing down that queue. I'll work with Klaus
>> on that qemu side (looks like a well placed qemu_bh_cancel() should do
>> it).
>>
> 
> Yuck. Bug located and quelched I think.
> 
> Jonathan, please try
> 
>   https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20221122081348.49963-2-its@irrelevant.dk/
> 
> This fixes the qemu crash, but I still see a "nvme still not live after
> 42 seconds!" resulting from the test. I'm seeing A LOT of invalid
> submission queue doorbell writes:
> 
>   pci_nvme_ub_db_wr_invalid_sq in nvme_process_db: submission queue doorbell write for nonexistent queue, sqid=0, ignoring
> 
> Tested on a 6.1-rc4.

Good change, just defers it a bit for me:

Thread 1 "qemu-system-x86" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0x7ffff7554400 (LWP 559269)]
0x000055555598922e in nvme_enqueue_req_completion (cq=0x0, req=0x7fffec141310) at ../hw/nvme/ctrl.c:1390
1390        assert(cq->cqid == req->sq->cqid);
(gdb) backtrace
#0  0x000055555598922e in nvme_enqueue_req_completion (cq=0x0, req=0x7fffec141310) at ../hw/nvme/ctrl.c:1390
#1  0x000055555598a7a7 in nvme_misc_cb (opaque=0x7fffec141310, ret=0) at ../hw/nvme/ctrl.c:2002
#2  0x000055555599448a in nvme_do_format (iocb=0x55555770ccd0) at ../hw/nvme/ctrl.c:5891
#3  0x00005555559942a9 in nvme_format_ns_cb (opaque=0x55555770ccd0, ret=0) at ../hw/nvme/ctrl.c:5828
#4  0x0000555555dda018 in blk_aio_complete (acb=0x7fffec1fccd0) at ../block/block-backend.c:1501
#5  0x0000555555dda2fc in blk_aio_write_entry (opaque=0x7fffec1fccd0) at ../block/block-backend.c:1568
#6  0x0000555555f506b9 in coroutine_trampoline (i0=-331119632, i1=32767) at ../util/coroutine-ucontext.c:177
#7  0x00007ffff77c84e0 in __start_context () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/__start_context.S:91
#8  0x00007ffff4ff2bd0 in  ()
#9  0x0000000000000000 in  ()


  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-22 20:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-17 21:22 [PATCH v2] tests/nvme: Add admin-passthru+reset race test Jonathan Derrick
2022-11-21 20:55 ` Keith Busch
2022-11-21 22:34   ` Jonathan Derrick
2022-11-21 22:47     ` Keith Busch
2022-11-21 22:49     ` Jonathan Derrick
2022-11-21 23:04       ` Keith Busch
2022-11-22  8:26         ` Klaus Jensen
2022-11-22 20:30           ` Jonathan Derrick [this message]
2022-11-23  8:15             ` Klaus Jensen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4f3c32a5-54cf-dcba-afe2-1f08b3f48b16@linux.dev \
    --to=jonathan.derrick@linux.dev \
    --cc=chaitanyak@nvidia.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=its@irrelevant.dk \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.