From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Torrens Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2008 11:25:41 +0000 Subject: Re: ----- Original Message ----- Message-Id: <4f6b4dc0f5Richard@Torrens.org.uk> List-Id: References: <4f66c18fa8Richard@Torrens.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <4f66c18fa8Richard@Torrens.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org In article <20080203103952.GG84525@mmj.dk>, Mads Martin Joergensen wrote: > This would unfortunately only catch people top posting from Outlook or > another client with that way of setting up replies. Catchhing some would be better than catching none, I think. Especially as it's the majority. > Some people even succeed in using Mutt for top postings :-) > * Richard Torrens [Jan 25. 2008 16:34]: > > A suggestion: > > > > Can the /access file rules be expanded to look for the dreaded > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > We can then moderate top posting. Or is there already a way? > This will be hard to do, I'm afraid. Fairy nuff. Thought it worth asking. > Have you tried educating the users Ah - you have a very good sense of humour! > or simply live with it? Was living with it under Mailman. Not pleasant! Bad netiquettse screws up the archives, but good netiquette and Micro$oft are incompatible, it seems.