From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: releases scheduling
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 01:01:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50018666.SlgxGSL9dQ@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1667533.heuKAiE6KB@xps13>
2015-12-13 20:22, Thomas Monjalon:
> We need to define the deadlines for the next releases.
> During 2015, we were doing a release every 4 months.
> If we keep the same pace, the next releases would be:
> 2.3: end of March
> 2.4: end of July
> 2.5: end of November
>
> However, things move fast and it may be a bit long to wait 4 months for
> a feature. That's why I suggest to progressively shorten release terms:
> 2.3: end of March
> 2.4: mid July
> 2.5: end of October
> and continue with a release every 3 months:
> 2.6: end of January
> 2.7: end of April
> 2.8: end of July
> This planning would preserve some of the major holiday periods
> (February, May, August, December).
>
> The first period, for the first submission of a feature, was 2 months long.
> Then we had 2 other months to discuss, merge and fix.
> We should shorten only the first period.
>
> Anyway, the next deadlines should be unchanged:
> - January 31: end of first submission phase
> - March 31: release 2.3
>
> Opinions are welcome.
It seems everybody agree with this new scheduling.
The web site will be updated accordingly:
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/web/2015-December/000008.html
There were some discussions to change the numbering scheme
and rename 2.3 to 16.04. The patch (with arguments) is welcome.
I won't do the patch myself because I don't care :)
Another discussion was about having a long term support,
i.e. doing some backport maintenance during a given period for
some selected releases.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-19 0:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-13 19:22 releases scheduling Thomas Monjalon
2015-12-15 13:37 ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2015-12-15 14:24 ` Arnon Warshavsky
2015-12-15 14:42 ` Wiles, Keith
2015-12-15 15:39 ` Jay Rolette
2015-12-15 19:15 ` Dave Neary
2015-12-15 21:15 ` Wiles, Keith
2015-12-15 21:40 ` Vincent JARDIN
2015-12-19 0:01 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2015-12-19 2:16 ` Wiles, Keith
2015-12-19 9:47 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-12-19 16:21 ` Wiles, Keith
2015-12-19 20:13 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-12-19 22:58 ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2015-12-27 20:04 ` Thomas Monjalon
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-05-12 9:38 Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50018666.SlgxGSL9dQ@xps13 \
--to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.