From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Henningsson Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: hda - Add DeviceID for Haswell HDA Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:20:37 +0200 Message-ID: <5003CED5.8080606@canonical.com> References: <1339554232-3410-1-git-send-email-xingchao.wang@intel.com> <50005F66.3050401@perex.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from youngberry.canonical.com (youngberry.canonical.com [91.189.89.112]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B5DD24BCB for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:20:41 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <50005F66.3050401@perex.cz> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Jaroslav Kysela Cc: Takashi Iwai , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 07/13/2012 07:48 PM, Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > !!Advanced information - PCI Vendor/Device/Subsystem ID's > !!------------------------------------------------------- > > 00:03.0 0403: 8086:0c0c (rev 01) > Subsystem: 8086:2010 > -- > 00:1b.0 0403: 8086:8c20 (rev 01) > Subsystem: 8086:7270 > > > Perhaps, we may add also some code to penalize the HDMI only HDA bridges > and allocate these cards on indexes 1+ by default (implement > AZX_DCAPS_INDEX1) . Comments? I'll prepare a patch upon an agreement. While this wouldn't hurt, I don't see much gain from it either. Are there really that many applications that hard-code "plughw:0", or what is the main reason that you want to switch the order of these two? -- David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd. https://launchpad.net/~diwic