From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8AFE00283 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 07:58:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Jul 2012 07:58:14 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="193420799" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.12.180]) ([10.255.12.180]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Jul 2012 07:58:14 -0700 Message-ID: <50042C06.70900@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 07:58:14 -0700 From: Joshua Lock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: McClintock Matthew-B29882 References: In-Reply-To: Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: edison/denzil patches (post-1.1.2 and 1.2.1) X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 14:58:15 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/07/12 10:43, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: > Josh, Scott: > > I've pushed a set of patches for edison/denzil branch - and I may push > a few more still to: > > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=mattsm/edison > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=mattsm/denzil > > These are all cherry-pick's and most applied cleanly and a few had > some minor cleanups. Please consider these for after the point > releases. I will continue to push to these branches and rebase these > branches off the official upstream trees as well. I don't know how much work will be done on Edison after the 1.1.2 release. I personally will no longer be working on it and I don't think the team here as enough resources to maintain it perpetually. I assume that these changes are predominantly to further improve PPC support? In general your branch has several types of changes that have generally been considered inappropriate for a point release (such as recipe upgrades, new functionality, etc). Personally I'm not very keen on the idea of pushing them all and advocating their inclusion. I'd strongly encourage adoption of this release series if it's to continue to be relevant to your work. Cheers, Joshua -- Joshua Lock Intel Open Source Technology Centre