From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] Question about antenna throughput.
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:19:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50044D0E.1060800@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmomJA182S7A-ak7e5Uh8sw8LcSUxjRsUx71WMexhNZQ8gg@mail.gmail.com>
On 07/15/2012 02:39 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 12 July 2012 07:11, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:
>> We have a 3x3 NIC (wpea-127n). A user reports that when using
>> a single antenna cable to directly connect to an AP (with attenuator),
>> that one of the antenna can do about 30Mbps download from AP, the
>> other about 25Mbps, and the third cable can only do about 1Mbps.
>>
>> Is that expected results?
>
> If I recall what's going on, the actual signal sent out the antennas
> isn't necessarily a mirrored copy from each antenna, even for 1 stream
> and legacy signals. Definitely for 2 and 3 stream signals that is
> absolutely to be expected.
>
> The baseband may decide to "scramble" it so part of the wireless
> transmission goes out each antenna. Don't ask me about the details, I
> don't know them.
>
> There's also STBC for 1 stream 11n rates.
>
> If you want to connect a single cable to an AP, you have to put it
> into a single chain TX/RX mode and use the correct chain. On that NIC
> you can configure it to be a single chain on any of chain 0, 1 or 2.
> (It doesn't have to be 0.) But you have to choose a single chain.
>
> So, yes. I think that's totally understandable behaviour.
Ok, I'm going to look into this chain configuration.
This user is also reporting that our box can only communicate
down to about -72dBm, whereas some off-the-shelf USB dongles
are providing around 100kbps at -78 to -80dBm.
Are there any published rate v/s range results for ath9k available?
Perhaps the chaining issue is also involved in this?
Thanks for the detailed answers on this....this is new
territory for me!
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-16 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-12 14:11 [ath9k-devel] Question about antenna throughput Ben Greear
2012-07-15 9:39 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-07-16 17:19 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2012-07-16 17:28 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-07-16 17:31 ` Ben Greear
2012-07-18 16:44 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-07-18 17:00 ` Ben Greear
2012-07-24 15:47 ` Ben Greear
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50044D0E.1060800@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.