From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Greear Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:31:22 -0700 Subject: [ath9k-devel] Question about antenna throughput. In-Reply-To: <20484.20256.578709.972505@gargle.gargle.HOWL> References: <4FFEDAFF.5090706@candelatech.com> <50044D0E.1060800@candelatech.com> <20484.20256.578709.972505@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Message-ID: <50044FEA.4060405@candelatech.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org On 07/16/2012 10:28 AM, Sujith Manoharan wrote: > Ben Greear wrote: >> Ok, I'm going to look into this chain configuration. >> >> This user is also reporting that our box can only communicate >> down to about -72dBm, whereas some off-the-shelf USB dongles >> are providing around 100kbps at -78 to -80dBm. >> >> Are there any published rate v/s range results for ath9k available? > > Not published, but we do have RvR numbers for ath9k, unfortunately > they are really old. > > I can get new numbers based on current -wt, maybe by this weekend, > and we can add them to the wiki or something. That would be great! Even brief details on how the tests were done would help too..we'd like to run similar tests and verify that our systems are performing at expected levels... Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com