From: Avinesh Kumar <akumar@suse.de>
To: Jan Polensky <japo@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Linux Test Project <ltp@lists.linux.it>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/1] safe_macros.c: Fix missing ro flag for FUSE NTFS mounts
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 12:19:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5005196.GXAFRqVoOG@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250727152454.682633-1-japo@linux.ibm.com>
Hi,
Reviewed-by: Avinesh Kumar <akumar@suse.de>
nit: maybe the patch title also should not mention NTFS.
-
Avinesh
On Sunday, July 27, 2025 5:24:54 PM CEST Jan Polensky wrote:
> The test incorrectly assumes that NTFS mounts are read-only, but the mount
> command does not explicitly set the read-only flag. As a result, the test fails
> when checking `sb_flags` against `MS_RDONLY`.
>
> Old behavior:
>
> sudo LTP_SINGLE_FS_TYPE=ntfs strace -e trace=mount,statmount -o log.log -s 128 -f ./statmount02
> ...
> statmount02.c:47: TFAIL: st_mount->sb_flags (0) != MS_RDONLY (1)
> ...
>
> Relevant log excerpt:
>
> 3890601 mount("/dev/zero", "/tmp/mountBDSEqk", "ntfs", 0, NULL) = -1 ENOTBLK (Block device required)
> 3890608 mount("/dev/loop0", "/tmp/LTP_staTPRruR/mntpoint", "fuseblk", 0, "allow_other,blksize=4096,fd=4,rootmode=40000,user_id=0,group_id=0") = 0
> 3890607 statmount({size=24, mnt_id=0x80010957, param=STATMOUNT_SB_BASIC}, {size=512, mask=STATMOUNT_SB_BASIC, sb_dev_major=7, sb_dev_minor=0, sb_magic=FUSE_SUPER_MAGIC, sb_flags=0}, 512, 0) = 0
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Polensky <japo@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
> ---
> Change since v1 (Thanks Cyril & thanks for the ping):
> * Removed restriction for NTFS.
>
> lib/safe_macros.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/safe_macros.c b/lib/safe_macros.c
> index 6946cc5bcb94..be04eb455d57 100644
> --- a/lib/safe_macros.c
> +++ b/lib/safe_macros.c
> @@ -942,10 +942,15 @@ int safe_mount(const char *file, const int lineno, void (*cleanup_fn)(void),
> */
> if (possibly_fuse(filesystemtype)) {
> char buf[1024];
> + const char* mount_fmt;
>
> tst_resm_(file, lineno, TINFO, "Trying FUSE...");
> - snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "mount.%s '%s' '%s'",
> - filesystemtype, source, target);
> + if (mountflags == MS_RDONLY)
> + mount_fmt = "mount.%s -o ro '%s' '%s'";
> + else
> + mount_fmt = "mount.%s '%s' '%s'";
> + snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), mount_fmt, filesystemtype,
> + source, target);
>
> rval = tst_system(buf);
> if (WIFEXITED(rval) && WEXITSTATUS(rval) == 0)
> --
> 2.50.1
>
>
>
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-29 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-27 15:24 [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/1] safe_macros.c: Fix missing ro flag for FUSE NTFS mounts Jan Polensky
2025-07-29 10:19 ` Avinesh Kumar [this message]
2025-08-05 11:49 ` Petr Vorel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5005196.GXAFRqVoOG@thinkpad \
--to=akumar@suse.de \
--cc=japo@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.