From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F55FE002A8 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 17:21:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q6I0L0g8002808 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 17 Jul 2012 17:21:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bruce-ashfields-macbook.local (128.224.22.131) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.255.0; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 17:21:00 -0700 Message-ID: <5006016A.7070408@windriver.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 20:20:58 -0400 From: Bruce Ashfield User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bodke, Kishore K" References: In-Reply-To: Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) for linux-yocto_3.2.bb X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 00:21:01 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 12-07-17 8:16 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: > Hi, > > I am using local clone for 3.2 kernel and I get build fail for > Linux-yocto_3.2.bb. > > WARNING: For recipe linux-yocto, the following files/directories were > installed but not shipped in any package: > > WARNING: /etc > > ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) on > /work/<….>/linux-yocto-3.2.18+git1+20958298c233d15b1d705e7b0eb93282d6ecb5de_1+7d26ac083cb255888536b42b622b97fb438753ad-r1/packages-split/kernel-vmlinux/boot/vmlinux-3.2.18-yocto-standard > > ERROR: QA run found fatal errors. Please consider fixing them. > > ERROR: Function failed: do_package_qa > > Any idea why I get this? It means you've managed to get a 32 bit object in a 64 bit build. Have you tweaked the configuration ? Cheers, Bruce > > Thanks > > Kishore. >