All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@amd.com>
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
	George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
	Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 3 v5/leftover] libxl: enable automatic placement of guests on NUMA nodes [and 1 more messages]
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 20:37:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <500853CE.8090500@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20488.7456.990576.233871@mariner.uk.xensource.com>

On 07/19/2012 04:43 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Andre Przywara writes ("Re: [PATCH 1 of 3 v5/leftover] libxl: enable automatic placement of guests on NUMA nodes [and 1 more messages]"):
>> On 07/18/2012 01:00 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>> What is the maximum number of NUMA nodes we might expect to see on a
>>> single system in the next five years?  I would argue that 32 is too
>>> optimistic.  128 or 256 seem like more reasonable upper bounds.
>>
>> Wow, what are you talking about?
>> To calm this down from the AMD side:
>> The current Opteron NUMA architecture is limited to exactly 8 nodes.
>> This has ever been the case since the release of Opteron and changing
>> this is not trivial and will not happen in any near future. In general I
>> don't think we will see much bigger NUMA systems, but more cluster like
>> architectures.
>
> One of these `more cluster like architectures', if it has shared
> memory at all, may well end up being most easily represented in the
> model supported by Xen as a NUMA host with a large number of nodes.
>
> We need to plan for the software that we are writing today to work for
> at least the next 5 years /even if we intend to replace the algorithm
> in the next release/.  It is very difficult to foresee what might
> happen to hardware in that time.
>
> But it's OK, we don't need to panic.  We just need a safety catch
> which stops this algorithm running in situations where it won't work.
> Following a discussion with Dario, AIUI he plans to implement a rule
> that it will bail on systems with more than 8 NUMA nodes.
>
> That is releasable in 4.2 and ought to be satisfactory for you ?

Absolutely, that's fine. I just wanted to make sure that we don't drop 
the patches at all because of the theoretical fear of a large NUMA box 
lingering somewhere around the corner...

Thanks,
Andre.

-- 
Andre Przywara
AMD-Operating System Research Center (OSRC), Dresden, Germany

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-19 18:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-10 15:03 [PATCH 0 of 3 v4/leftover] Automatic NUMA placement for xl Dario Faggioli
2012-07-10 15:03 ` [PATCH 1 of 3 v4/leftover] libxl: enable automatic placement of guests on NUMA nodes Dario Faggioli
2012-07-16 17:13   ` [PATCH 0 of 3 v5/leftover] Automatic NUMA placement for xl Dario Faggioli
2012-07-16 17:13     ` [PATCH 1 of 3 v5/leftover] libxl: enable automatic placement of guests on NUMA nodes Dario Faggioli
2012-07-19 12:21       ` Andre Przywara
2012-07-19 14:22         ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-20  8:19           ` Andre Przywara
2012-07-20  9:39             ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-20 10:01               ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-20  8:20           ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-20  8:26             ` Andre Przywara
2012-07-20  8:38               ` Juergen Gross
2012-07-20  9:52                 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-20  9:56                   ` Juergen Gross
2012-07-20  9:44               ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-20 11:47                 ` Andre Przywara
2012-07-20 12:54                   ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-20 13:07                     ` Andre Przywara
2012-07-21  1:44                       ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-16 17:13     ` [PATCH 2 of 3 v5/leftover] libxl: have NUMA placement deal with cpupools Dario Faggioli
2012-07-16 17:13     ` [PATCH 3 of 3 v5/leftover] Some automatic NUMA placement documentation Dario Faggioli
2012-07-20 11:07     ` [PATCH 0 of 3 v5/leftover] Automatic NUMA placement for xl David Vrabel
2012-07-20 11:43       ` Andre Przywara
2012-07-20 12:00         ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-20 12:08           ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-23 10:38             ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-23 10:42               ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-23 15:31                 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-23 10:23           ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-20 12:14         ` David Vrabel
2012-07-17 15:55   ` [PATCH 1 of 3 v4/leftover] libxl: enable automatic placement of guests on NUMA nodes Ian Jackson
2012-07-17 15:59     ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-17 18:01       ` Ian Jackson
2012-07-17 18:04     ` [PATCH 1 of 3 v5/leftover] libxl: enable automatic placement of guests on NUMA nodes [and 1 more messages] Ian Jackson
2012-07-17 20:23       ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-18  0:31         ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-18 10:44         ` Ian Jackson
2012-07-18  0:22       ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-18  8:27         ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-18  9:13         ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-18  9:43           ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-18  9:53             ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-18 10:08               ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-18 11:00               ` Ian Jackson
2012-07-18 13:14                 ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-18 13:35                   ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-19 12:47                   ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-18 13:40                 ` Andre Przywara
2012-07-18 13:54                   ` Juergen Gross
2012-07-18 14:00                   ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-19 14:43                   ` Ian Jackson
2012-07-19 18:37                     ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2012-07-21  1:46                       ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-18 10:53             ` Ian Jackson
2012-07-18 13:12               ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-18  9:47         ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-17 22:15     ` [PATCH 1 of 3 v4/leftover] libxl: enable automatic placement of guests on NUMA nodes Dario Faggioli
2012-07-10 15:03 ` [PATCH 2 of 3 v4/leftover] libxl: have NUMA placement deal with cpupools Dario Faggioli
2012-07-10 15:03 ` [PATCH 3 of 3 v4/leftover] Some automatic NUMA placement documentation Dario Faggioli
2012-07-16 17:03 ` [PATCH 0 of 3 v4/leftover] Automatic NUMA placement for xl Dario Faggioli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=500853CE.8090500@amd.com \
    --to=andre.przywara@amd.com \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=raistlin@linux.it \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.