From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mr Dash Four Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ipset: change 'iface' part in hash:net,iface set Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 23:52:46 +0100 Message-ID: <50088FBE.7090006@googlemail.com> References: <4FFCBDB8.9080101@googlemail.com> <4FFF6EF2.6010108@googlemail.com> <5000293F.4030901@googlemail.com> <50002F3F.5020408@googlemail.com> <5001678C.6000505@googlemail.com> <5002AF68.9070204@googlemail.com> <5002F0AF.4000502@googlemail.com> <500340DF.6070207@googlemail.com> <50040B6A.608@googlema il.com> <5005F552.9060301@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Netfilter Core Team , Pablo Neira Ayuso , Patrick McHardy To: Jozsef Kadlecsik Return-path: Received: from mail-we0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:44480 "EHLO mail-we0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751966Ab2GSWwx (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:52:53 -0400 Received: by weyx8 with SMTP id x8so2142032wey.19 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 15:52:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > I don't see any point in reopening a dead case. Care to explain the above and the "reopening a dead case" bit in particular? > I don't expect any new argument to turn up which hasn't been discussed a couple of times, > "Discussed"? What I'd suggest you do is lookup the definition of that word in your local dictionary and educate yourself up a bit. A discussion on a particular subject usually takes place when there are (at least) two willing and participating parties. I don't remember you being "willing" nor "participating". What I do remember though is constantly evading my questions, giving me the "I am fed up" routine or start barking orders every time you get cornered or you are about to loose the argument. You are only willing to enter into a "discussion" with someone as long as nobody challenges or questions your views, otherwise, as I just pointed out above, you start throwing your toys out of the pram and declare to everyone else willing to listen that "the case is closed" (case in point - see above!). This isn't a discussion - it is a monologue. And I am sure you know how people who talk to themselves are referred to by others, right? > You are free to submit your patches with the features I disagree with - > and I'll dutifully reject your patchset. > I rest my case!