From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mr Dash Four Subject: Re: ulogd - rpm file generation Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 01:12:14 +0100 Message-ID: <5008A25E.2090108@googlemail.com> References: <50088FB0.4020403@googlemail.com> <50089863.7000803@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from mail-we0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:50614 "EHLO mail-we0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752555Ab2GTAMV (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jul 2012 20:12:21 -0400 Received: by weyx8 with SMTP id x8so2174258wey.19 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 17:12:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > No idea what you patched in the package, or otherwise did to your > system. On a pure Centos 5.8. I did *NOT* talk about fc13. > I don't give two hoots what is/isn't supported on a bloody CentOS system, quite frankly! The point I was making is that libnetfilter_acct does *NOT* depend on glibc 2.9 as evident from my previous post. Oh, and also: > >> ulogd depends on libnetfilter_acct, which in turn requires glibc >= >> 2.9, and RHEL5 is just too damn old. >> > Nope! If libnetfilter_acct is compiled from source it does *not* > require glibc >= 2.9 and uses the version of glibc on the host system. > > It is how I managed to build (and use) ulogd on one of my FC13-based > machines - built and installed it from source, together with its > immediate dependencies (libnetfilter_acct-devel, > libnetfilter_log-devel, libnfnetlink-devel & > libnetfilter_conntrack_devel). Can you read?